Max Bowsher wrote:

Unless someone feels like making a FAT-detection patch, the previous status
quo looks to me like the best option.

Would "creating a file in the same dir" be "too invasive"?
Of course this would only solve the problem if one file is created/tested "per directory"...
I guess cygwin HAS a call to examine the mount table and to try directly "one file per mount", but the root of the mount could be non writeable.
Mhh. Not so easy as a patch as I first thought.

Will check ASAP.

--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)


--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Reply via email to