Paul Wouters [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
> Yes, imagine your nice logfiles being reduced to 0 bytes because
> someone removed them on the server. My backups will vanish as soon
> as rsynch is done (assuming --delete). I'm not using --delete on the
> incremental, but want to use it on the week-old
>How does everybody (especially Martin and Tridge) feel about the idea of
>rsync defaulting to "-e ssh" if it is invoked under the name ssync? Around
>here everybody is being told they should stop using r* commands and start
>using the s* equivalents so it seems a natural changeover. If there is
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, David Bolen wrote:
> Is there a reason that you can't just use a single backup location
> based on a weekly cycle even if you're backing them up daily? (E.g.,
> rather than $DATE for the output directory on your daily runs, compute
> a target directory based on week rather t
I actually like the name rsync :)
I'd be very happy with a configure option that sets the default remote
shell, and I don't mind a argv[0] check that knows about the name
ssync, but I'd prefer for the package to still be called "rsync" as I
think the name is well enough known that a change at thi
Paul Wouters [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
> Now, I do realise this is still fairly efficient on our network, and
> that's not my problem. My problem is more the diskspace all these
> logfiles take up. Now I can't believe I'm the first one to have this
> problem, and unless everyone else switched t
Good idea - I'm in favour, although it'll take me a year or two to stop
calling it rsync.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> How does everybody (especially Martin and Tridge) feel about the idea of
> rsync defaulting to "-e ssh" if it is invoked under the name ssync? Around
> here every
Hi,
We're doing offsite backups using rsync, more or less the cookbook example
using:
rsync --numeric-ids --compress --rsh=/usr/bin/ssh --recursive --archive \
--relative --sparse --one-file-system \
--compare-dest=/vol/backup/$HOSTNAME/current $HOSTNAME:$DIRECTORY \
/vol/back
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 08:46:51AM -0600, Denmark B. Weatherburn wrote:
> I had asked this same question a few weeks ago, but I got no response.
> I'm still interested in finding out though.
>
> Regards,
>
> Denmark W.
> - Original Message -
> From: Vikram Shrinivas Poojari
> To:
How does everybody (especially Martin and Tridge) feel about the idea of
rsync defaulting to "-e ssh" if it is invoked under the name ssync? Around
here everybody is being told they should stop using r* commands and start
using the s* equivalents so it seems a natural changeover. If there is
gen
I had asked this same question a few weeks ago, but I got no
response.
I'm still interested in finding out though.
Regards,
Denmark W.
- Original Message -
From:
Vikram Shrinivas Poojari
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Good morning
all,
Will RSYNC compile
on VMS. I have a requirement to synchronise data files between a Solaris
node and a VMS node.
Any help
appreciated.
Regards
Grant
Grant
McKechnie
UNIX Systems
Consultant
NextGen Unix
TEAM
(: +44 (0) 20 7264
2083 x6331
): +44 (0) 7799 746
341
11 matches
Mail list logo
