>How does everybody (especially Martin and Tridge) feel about the idea of >rsync defaulting to "-e ssh" if it is invoked under the name ssync? Around >here everybody is being told they should stop using r* commands and start >using the s* equivalents so it seems a natural changeover. If there is >general agreement, I'm willing to implement it and change the default >installation to install symlinks at bin/ssync and man/man1/ssync.1. Dear Dave, Why not just use ssh as the default if it is there? At present the configure scripts look first for remsh and set HAVE_REMSH Then the conditional definitions in rsync.h mean that RSYNC_RSH will get set to "remsh". At configure time why not look for ssh, add HAVE_SSH and conditionally set RSYNC_RSH to "ssh"? It worked for me. michaelj
- should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Ashwin Mansinghka
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Robert Scholten
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Andrew Tridgell
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Michael James
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Martin Pool
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Philip Hands
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Martin Pool
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Andrew Tridgell
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? tim . conway
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? tim . conway