How does everybody (especially Martin and Tridge) feel about the idea of rsync defaulting to "-e ssh" if it is invoked under the name ssync? Around here everybody is being told they should stop using r* commands and start using the s* equivalents so it seems a natural changeover. If there is general agreement, I'm willing to implement it and change the default installation to install symlinks at bin/ssync and man/man1/ssync.1. - Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Ashwin Mansinghka
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Robert Scholten
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Andrew Tridgell
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Michael James
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Martin Pool
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Philip Hands
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Dave Dykstra
- Re: should rsync also be called ssync? Martin Pool