x27;
> from script/spec:5
> ##
Didn't you mean SchedulesController instead of MeetingsController in the spec.
>From the snippet from your routes.rb I wouldn't expect you to have a
MeetingsController.
And controller specs don't
gt;>>>>> has anybody experienced this problem before? I'm using rspec and
>>>>>>> rspec-rails at version 1.2.6, with Rails 2.3.2, while customizing
>>>>>>> Spree 0.8.99
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please run this spec f
tempted to run the spec under rdebug, put a breakpoint before
the stub! call and step into it to see what's going on.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http:
under OS X, using passenger and apache, but I've done similar things
on a linux development machine before.
On OS X, the passenger preference pane makes this dead easy, and
passenger runs the rails app on demand, and shuts it down when it's
been idle.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://t
there must be a comparison/conversion chart
somewhere, like the Test:Unit => RSpec translation guide in the RSpec
docs, but my usually awesome google skills seem to be failing me on
this.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Rick
I'm now in the process of facing converting a rails app to use Ruby 1.9.1.
Has anyone figured out how to use 1.9 with the RSpec bundle in
textmate and preferably how to switch back and forth?
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeN
to all Ruby
objects, just Kernel#should and Kernel#should_not and that's it. I
guess that's the decoupling you're talking about.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-ri
it is probably via the RSpec book which is currently under
development and covers both RSpec and Cucumber. Although it's
pre-production, it's available under the Pragmatic Programmers beta
program.
http://pragprog.com/titles/achbd/the-rspec-book
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talkli
m, which is about as "bread and butter" Ruby as you can get,
> readable to anybody who's ever read the first chapter of a Ruby book.
I think that the english text is secondary to doing something which
doesn't require mixing another method or methods into all objects.
In the ear
=> 'admin'> was
I like Pat's idea too, but
[x, y, z].should_not all_be_allowed_to(...)
doesn't seem to be the same thing as
none_of(x, y, z).should be_allowed_to(...)
maybe
[x, y, z].should all_not_be_alllowed_to(...)
but I'm not sure
--
Rick DeNa
ich sets instance
>> variables on the User class.
>> The user in the console comes from find(), and those ivars are not yet
>> set.
>
> Also - @params in the User class (in the class methods) is not the same
> @params in the User instances (in update_
or yet another synonym for describe or
context.
In which case I'd suggest just using describe or context as in:
context "given a certain set of paths" do
before(:each) do
# code to set up the paths however the included specs need them, e.g.
@paths = ["a/b", "c/d
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> 2009/12/22 Rick DeNatale
> Please explain why - thanks.
Because, classes and class variables aren't guaranteed to be persistent.
In development mode, classes can get reloaded, which wipes out class
(and class instance) var
rather than cleaning up afterwards.
Why? Because it's easier to debug failures if you preserve the evidence.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com
ing
>> is that the object exists, responds to certain messages and gives certain
>> values back for those messages. Thinking about types is so Java, C++ :-)
>
> Generally speaking, you're correct, but there are cases where this is
> valuable - like if you're spec
ppreciation is always appreciated :)
I can appreciate that!
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedi
y wanted
1.should be_a FixNum
instead of
1.class.should be_a Fixnum
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale
___
nclude("1:4")
which is clearer IMHO.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale
__
gress, but my
imagination is failing me as to how to do it.
Any ideas?
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ri
h the describe groups as well? I would like to be able to run
> all of the examples in either "first group" or "second group". Will it
> match?
Also, does anyone but me find the expectation in the case where
there's no match surprising?
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog
tar!
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users
e increase
of entropy.
It may seem hard, but remember the more you fight it the more you
delay the heat death of the universe!
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
Linke
would want to prove that you were finding the right user in
this case, although I'd guess in most conventional rails apps these
days you'd actually stub the controllers current_user method to return
@user rather than stubbing User.find
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhav
bbing
difficult among other things.
Thoughts?
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale
tend to do, is to not use chained scopes in
controllers, but define model methods which use them, which allows for
stubbing/mocking those methods, and keeps the train wrecks isolated.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickD
e
software.
I guess that the current beta PDF will serve as the best checkpoint
for RSpec 1 and Rails 2.x. I guess it's time to print a personal
hard-copy.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwit
s
> http://github.com/rspec-rails
I think those should be:
http://github.com/rspec/rspec
http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core
http://github.com/rspec/rspec-dev
http://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations
http://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks
http://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails
--
Rick DeNa
some kind of testing harness for
Rake tasks with RSpec. I tried googling but kept coming up with stuff
about using the rake tasks provided by RSpec.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwit
a
separate method which takes the IO object as a parameter, and test
that method passing in a StringIO.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-
Views tend to change a lot as the UI of an application evolves, so
specs tend to be brittle.
If views have a lot of logic, that's a code smell. In rails such
behavior belongs in either the controller, or a helper, and that's
where I invest my spec efforts.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http:/
ailure is a bit confusing,
but the argument list to the with method should look like the argument
list to the expected method. The expectation here is that find should
get one argument, an array with a symbol and a hash, rather than two
parameters, a symbol and a hash.
It would be better if t
ld_receive(:get).with(url).and_raise(exception_new)
>
lambda {TinyUrlService.make_tiny(url)}.should raise_exception
> end
> end
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://w
the auxiliary
files use the gem directive to specify a particular version of
active_record.
Have a look at http://github.com/rubyredrick/ri_cal/tree/master/tasks/
Particularly spec.rake and the files in the gem_loader sub directory.
HTH
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.
stuff you need from rspec-rails in the
development environment into a separate rspec-rails-dev gem or
something like that.
Breaking up gems seems to have been a theme in the transition from
Rails 2 -> Rails 3.
Just an idea
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://git
o
rather than
describe "user_sessions/new.html.haml" do
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:17 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:10 PM, David Chelimsky
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:14 PM, geetarista wrote:
>>>> Since Rspec-Rails
ndencies.
I have a similar issue with the RiCal gem. It works with either the
activesupport OR tzinfo gems, rather than require either I just
document that it requires one or the other and leave it up to the
user.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://git
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/2010/06/25/making-rspec-rake-and-bundler-play-well-together
Note this is for Rails 2.3, not sure if Rails 3 and Rspec 2 would be different.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
ge this to spec the results rather than the implementation:
e.g.
foo = Foo.new
foo.bar.should == foo
Assuming that foo and bar have public accessors for bar and foo respectively.
If not you can use instance_variable_get to 'get' around that.
HTH
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http:
efineFoo
foo2 = Foo.new
foo2.methods - Object.instance_methods # => ["m1"]
foo.methods - Object.instance_methods # => ["m1", "m2"]
foo.class == foo2.class # => false
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Bruno Cardoso wrote:
> Rick Denatale wrote:
>> Your pastie says
>> # this should have made "Account" go back to its original state but
>> it's not working.
>> # this works outside of RSpec.
>>
>> but I don
delimiter matching etc. and the cost of having
a separate language definition in the RSpec bundle in terms of
confusion and or maintenance probably isn't worth it.
For more about how textmate detects file times see:
http://blog.macromates.com/2007/file-type-detection-rspec-r
le
doesn't have a language definition since rspec files are really ruby
files and want to use that language definition.
I guess I just don't see what's wrong with using the convention of
naming spec files with the suffix _spec.rb as Mr. Textmate suggests
http://blog.macromates.co
t
via google or the latest draft of the book.
Second, unless let! is a new method which not only defines the
memoized method but invokes it, then the order of evaluation will
depend on the order the generated let methods are invoked in the
example won't it?
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: ht
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:23 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Elliot Winkler
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Phillip Koebbe
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Ashley Moran
wrote:
>
> On 9 Aug 2010, at 17:37, Rick DeNatale wrote:
>
>> Well, I'd still use a different file name suffix which I could set
>> textmate to recognize as a spec
>>
>> _sspec.rb or _sgroup.rb
>>
>>
it not (going to be) mentioned in the book, it
doesn't seem to be in Beta 15.0 supposedly the final beta version.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/pe
;s reply, I don't think you should, Lei.
What you really should be testing that the observable effects of the
call are 'as if' the super call were made.
If you could test that the super call was made it would be testing
that the implementation were a certain way more
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Zhi-Qiang Lei wrote:
>
> On Sep 30, 2010, at 9:56 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
>
>> What you really should be testing that the observable effects of the
>> call are 'as if' the super call were made.
>>
>> If you could te
-flies-while-youre-having-fun-testing
More recently I've been using timecop
http://github.com/jtrupiano/timecop
It allows time to be either frozen or offset, and it stubs Time,
DateTime and Date to do the right thing.
--
Rick DeNatale
Help fund my talk at Ruby Conf 2010:http://pledgie.co
uby Conf next month.
http://www.youtube.com/v/kEaB-Di89S8
--
Rick DeNatale
Help fund my talk at Ruby Conf 2010:http://pledgie.com/campaigns/13677
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-ric
And as Wincent points out, you don't usually need to do such plumbing
yourself, there are lots of RSpec compatible matchers (including the
Shoulda matchers) freely available.
--
Rick DeNatale
Help fund my talk at Ruby Conf 2010:http://pledgie.com/campaigns/13677
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.
pec-problem.jpg
>
> Again, any suggestions on how to get this working would really be
> appreciated.
>
> Michelle
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> ___
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.o
in lib/autotest/rspec2.rb
def using_bundler?
File.exists?('./Gemfile') && !defined Autotest::Bundler # and
also check for the option if you decide to do #1
end
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/ru
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> On Jan 18, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:15 AM, David Chelimsky
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Since the release of rspec-2.0, I've bee
> anything, and you'll see a message saying so. At that point, you
> either use the autotest/bundler plugin or not.
>
> Thoughts?
That sounds reasonably pragmatic to me.
Of course I've only had two sips of coffee this morning.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.d
meaning of before(:all) for some people, after(:any) to me evokes the
curent meaning of after(:each) more than it does after(:all), i.e.
after any OF the examples rather than after all the examples, because
I'd never say after any the examples.
But that might just be me.
--
Rick DeNat
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:09 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> You can either use mock_model or mock_stub
David,
Did you mean to say stub_model rather than mock_stub?
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
o include the location
> information so you can get right to the example if you need to:
>
> RSpec.configure do |c|
> c.after do |m|
> Rails.logger.debug "=== ^^ #{m.example.full_description} ^^ ==="
> Rails.logger.debug "=== ^^ #{m.example.location} ^^ ==="
&
rc file in your home directory
set listsize 12
in that file should set the default number of lines for the list
command to show,
perhaps that file changed.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://
eated.
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_validations_callbacks.html#creating-custom-validation-methods
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: h
r is trying to transpose the characters to ~! which is
syntactically incorrect sugar. Although this might be a typo in the post.
→ irb
>> 'abc' !~ /def/
=> true
>> 'abc' ~! /def/
SyntaxError: compile error
(irb):2: syntax error, unexpected '~
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 7:59 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Thanks for setting things straight.
Just happy to be here sir!
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9
My 2 cents
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/articles/2008/11/05/the-rspec-caboo-se-brouhaha
--
Rick DeNatale
My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman
be' error.
I'm sure that it's some configuration error, but so far googling has not
brought any joy.
Any help appreciated.
--
Rick DeNatale
My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users
; > @adtag.should_not be_valid
>
And since it's the valid? call which sets the errors, even if you address
the problems pointed out by David, those errors expectations won't be met if
you do things in this order.
--
Rick DeNatale
My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck
ne lots of googling about this, and everything about running autotest
for RSpec for non-rails projects seems to be quite old. I did find one old
post which recommended making a .autotest file in the project with mappings
based on the rspec-rails mappings, which is what I tried above, but no joy.
Any in
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Mark Wilden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
>> $ autospec
>> loading autotest/rspec
>> /opt/local/bin/ruby -S spec/lib/v_date_time_property_spec.rb
&
od defined in the rspec gem in lib/autotest/rspec.rb
def make_test_cmd(files_to_test)
return '' if files_to_test.empty?
return "#{ruby} -S #{files_to_test.keys.flatten.join(' ')}
#{add_options_if_present}"
end
I guess I need to file a bug report?!?
--
R
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Okay,
>
> If I add this to my .autospec file
>
> class Autotest::Rspec
>
> def make_test_cmd(files_to_test)
> return '' if files_to_test.empty?
> ret
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 'look at me, ma, I'm opening the eigenclass!'
>
> "Honey, if you're going to open your eigenclass, do it in your room."
>
And if you keep doing it, you'll go blind!
w.w3.org/TR/CSS2/selector.html#q2
This might also be of help
http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/understandingnthchildexpressions
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RubyRedRick
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
ls which
cannot.
2. As is the case in decimal fractions, where some rational numbers such as
1/3 cannot be represented without an infinite number of decimal digits,
there are similar values dependent on the base used for the float
representation.
There's a whole branch of computer science, Num
ourse according to the last meaning of Fu in that article*, the
technical meaning of Fu is
Fu is having the ability to run Windows applications on Linux or OS X.
* "Fu is having wine"
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatal
rompted me to make yet another
suggestion
http://gist.github.com/55165
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:36 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Rick DeNatale
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:33 PM, David Chelimsky
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > I agree this discussion should move to a ticket. But it seems I a
the
latest articles and comments, but I wanted to let anyone who was interested,
if such a person exists, what was up.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> I've got a simple ActionMailer::Base subclass:
> class InfoMailer < ActionMailer::Base
>
> def info(user, zip_name)
> recipients user.email
> subject "Requested Info"
> attac
; FAILED
expected: "",
got: "Attachment: xyz.zip\n" (using ==)
It's looking like the mail template never got rendered, and body is giving
me the attachment since it's the only part.
I've got one other mailer method in that mailer which
should
that be non-truthy) value.
Even 'should be' is a bit grating. I'm tempted to write a pair of matchers
like be_truthy and be_falsy, but I was wondering what other RSpec users have
to say.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Stephen Eley wrote:
> 2009/3/19 Rick DeNatale :
> > Even 'should be' is a bit grating. I'm tempted to write a pair of
> matchers
> > like be_truthy and be_falsy, but I was wondering what other RSpec users
> have
> > to
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Zach Dennis wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Zach Dennis
> wrote:
> > 2009/3/18 Rick DeNatale :
> >> I've got a simple ActionMailer::Base subclass:
> >> class InfoMailer < ActionMailer::Base
> >>
> &
ot of time debugging
your steps to convince yourself that "the flight on the second day" maps to
"another flight leaving on the following day" when you reuse the steps in
other cases. I found myself wanting to do meta bdd on my story code!
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeadu
ame.feature --format=html
false
Cucumber runs fine from bash.
Am I missing some setup?
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.lin
GP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkn0x+cACgkQf3s7GyRXBzRe1QCeJgBAk6jJX4xinYTZYyQ05ngm
> aGUAn1hU6grPNIXgoTYAW4t79a1qjOdq
> =cn4o
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> ___
> rspec-users mailing list
>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
>> Rick DeNatale wrote:
>>>
>>> I finally plunked down for the beta RSpec bundle and I'm working
>>> through the initial example. Although I
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
> Rick DeNatale wrote:
>>
>> I finally plunked down for the beta RSpec bundle and I'm working
>> through the initial example. Although I'm a fairly experienced RSpec
>> user, I'm stlll learning new t
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:07 AM, aslak hellesoy
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Rick DeNatale
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Rick DeNatale
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
>> &g
nd/features/codebreaker_starts_game.feature
--format=html: No such file or directory false
I'm guessing that the file it isn't finding is cucumber? Is there an
environment variable I need to set in textmate?
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhav
nheim, which prompted me to
write that article.
http://robsanheim.com/2008/01/25/why-i-use-testspec-over-rspec/
(It seems to be down right now, try googling for sanheim rspec and
check the cached version)
But that seems to be changing.
Rob wrote this more recently:
http://blog.thinkrelevance.
evolution of RSpec is fascinating- very organic and collaborative.
For another recent barometer reading of how much ReSPECt RSpec gets
these days, have a look at http://rubytrends.com/
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://ww
rios to keep you on the track of doing the next
thing that NEEDS to be done is a very good way to stave off the desire
to shave yaks.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denat
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
> + 1
>
>
> aslak hellesoy wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> *snip*
>
> Thanks,
> Aslak
So let me get this right,
you agreed with Aslak that you shouldn't top post.
by top posting
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http:
y inserting a rack app which just does this.
David C. and I put support for the -u/--debugger options for the spec
command a few releases back, I don't know if this has any effect on
cucumber.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNa
asks like
rake spec:tzinfo
rake spec:activesupport
rake spec:both
The problem is that I think I need something like the fork option for
spec task similar to the one in the cucumber task, since once loaded I
can't unload one or the other gem in the same ruby process.
Is there a trick I'm mi
ec in source code form for non-commercial
> purposes? I was unable to find the RSpec license to confirm. Gallio itself
> is open source and is distributed using the Apache License 2.0.
RSpec is licensed under the MIT license:
http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/blob/dfffe80e65067e8410f54d30b9de96a
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:57 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Rick DeNatale
> wrote:
>> Ideally I'd like to
>> have rake tasks like
>>
>> rake spec:tzinfo
>> rake spec:activesupport
>> rake spec:both
>>
>
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> So I tried to make a spectask to run the specs after require in
> activesupport by adding this in my rake file:
>
> desc "Run all specs with activesupport"
> Spec::Rake::SpecTask.new(:spec_as) do |t|
> t.spe
> reason for Java programmers who want to use Cucumber to join the RSpec
> ML.
>
As a long-time RSpec, and now Cucumber user, to me the Java stuff is
the noise .
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http:
stance method, so instead of:
AdSenseHeavenParser.should_receive(:parse).with(keyword_list_contents).and_return({:keywords
=> [], :errors => []})
You should have
controller.should_receive(:parse).with(keyword_list_contents).and_return({:keywords
=> [], :errors => []})
--
Rick De
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo