On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Zach Dennis <zach.den...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Lee Hambley <lee.hamb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm honestly sure that nobody cares, but this list needs to split, I can't >> handle the volume of `junk` that is completely irrelevant because I am >> subscribed looking for to keep up to date with cucumber wisdom; I'm going to >> see how this message is received, and unsubscribe myself later today. > >> The SNR ratio is absurd, and the list users should really consider a split. >> Thanks for the things I've learned, and the tips and tricks that I have been >> fortunate enough to pick up.
> I use both RSpec and Cucumber and I don't personally mind them being > on the same list as it allows me participate in discussions that > pertain to the full cycle of outside-in development. I can see where > you are coming from though since you only seem to care about the > Cucumber aspect of things. If the lists are split I will simply > subscribe to both. > > A nice thing about having the two ML's combined at this point is that > discussions and questions which span the entire BDD process can be > asked and answered. The down-side of this is that not all folks who > use Cucumber use RSpec (or even Ruby). > > I don't encourage the split, but I think it is becoming inevitable. > Cucumber itself is becoming large and wide. I can't think of a good > reason for Java programmers who want to use Cucumber to join the RSpec > ML. > As a long-time RSpec, and now Cucumber user, to me the Java stuff is the noise <G>. -- Rick DeNatale Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
