On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:49 PM, rogerdpack <rogerpack2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any interest in the following idea?
>
>
> a.should include?("1:4") # if there's no matcher called include? then
> just call include?
>
> or something along those lines?
-1
You can already say
a.should include("1:4")
which is clearer IMHO.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
