On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Lee Hambley wrote:
>
> To me too, maybe we could get some mileage by just having a convention of
> tagging subjects properly [rspec-users][cucumber][java] etc.. and people
> could filter out what they just don't care about
>
Been there, mandated that - it didn't
Rick,
To me too, maybe we could get some mileage by just having a convention of
tagging subjects properly [rspec-users][cucumber][java] etc.. and people
could filter out what they just don't care about
Actually, looking at today's mail, its the Java thread that broke the
proverbial camel's back an
makes no difference to me, if the list were to split, i'd subscribe
to both so I'd see the same signal and noise.
--linoj
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Zach Dennis wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Lee Hambley wrote:
>> I'm honestly sure that nobody cares, but this list needs to split, I can't
>> handle the volume of `junk` that is completely irrelevant because I am
>> subscribed looking for to keep up
Zach,
You hit the nail on the head exactly, the problem was compounded by my being
on vacation for a week, and coming back to a flood of emails, regrettably my
gmail filters can't even take the strain, I can't restrict it accurately
enough, as there isn't enough standardization in subject tagging
(
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Lee Hambley wrote:
> I'm honestly sure that nobody cares, but this list needs to split, I can't
> handle the volume of `junk` that is completely irrelevant because I am
> subscribed looking for to keep up to date with cucumber wisdom; I'm going to
> see how this m
I'm honestly sure that nobody cares, but this list needs to split, I can't
handle the volume of `junk` that is completely irrelevant because I am
subscribed looking for to keep up to date with cucumber wisdom; I'm going to
see how this message is received, and unsubscribe myself later today.
The SN
