On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Lee Hambley <lee.hamb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm honestly sure that nobody cares, but this list needs to split, I can't > handle the volume of `junk` that is completely irrelevant because I am > subscribed looking for to keep up to date with cucumber wisdom; I'm going to > see how this message is received, and unsubscribe myself later today.
> The SNR ratio is absurd, and the list users should really consider a split. > Thanks for the things I've learned, and the tips and tricks that I have been > fortunate enough to pick up. Over the entire weekend I received a little over 30 messages on this list. I wouldn't exactly consider that high-volume or absurd. I use both RSpec and Cucumber and I don't personally mind them being on the same list as it allows me participate in discussions that pertain to the full cycle of outside-in development. I can see where you are coming from though since you only seem to care about the Cucumber aspect of things. If the lists are split I will simply subscribe to both. A nice thing about having the two ML's combined at this point is that discussions and questions which span the entire BDD process can be asked and answered. The down-side of this is that not all folks who use Cucumber use RSpec (or even Ruby). I don't encourage the split, but I think it is becoming inevitable. Cucumber itself is becoming large and wide. I can't think of a good reason for Java programmers who want to use Cucumber to join the RSpec ML. > - Lee > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > -- Zach Dennis http://www.continuousthinking.com (personal) http://www.mutuallyhuman.com (hire me) @zachdennis (twitter) _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
