Re: [Rpy] rpy and numpy arrays

On 10/24/07, Gregory Warnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > I've made a bunch of changes in the SVN source code repository, some > of which are specifically related to Numeric/NumPy conversion. Can > y'all give the new code a try to see if it helps? Greg, Thanks for making the cha

Re: [Rpy] rpy and numpy arrays

Hi Gregg, > I've made a bunch of changes in the SVN source code repository, some > of which are specifically related to Numeric/NumPy conversion. Can > y'all give the new code a try to see if it helps? For 64 bit to work, the use of 'int' to define the dimensions for a numpy array has to be chan

Re: [Rpy] rpy and numpy arrays

Thanks, I'll take a look when I'm off the clock! -G On Oct 25, 2007, at 9:17AM , Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi Gregg, > >> I've made a bunch of changes in the SVN source code repository, some >> of which are specifically related to Numeric/NumPy conversion. Can >> y'all give the new code a try to

Re: [Rpy] Another patch idea (Was: forwarded message from Matthew Brett)

Hi, > > [ Matt: In case you're curious: http://bugs.debian.org/443147 has > > the details ] Thanks for the pointer. It looks like it could be a symptom of the same problem I was trying to fix... > Applying this patch to the most recent debian rpy sources and > compiling and installing under amd

[Rpy] RPy and R 2.5.1? 1.0final?

Does Rpy work with R 2.5.1? I didn't see any version compatibility description except for something about Windows. The version number seems to have been at 1.0RC3 for awhile. Are there plans to release 1.0 final anytime soon? Thanks, Skip Montanaro --

Re: [Rpy] RPy and R 2.5.1? 1.0final?

Skip Montanaro wrote: > Does Rpy work with R 2.5.1? I didn't see any version compatibility > description except for something about Windows. The version number > seems to have been at 1.0RC3 for awhile. Are there plans to release > 1.0 final anytime soon? > > Thanks, > > Skip Montanaro > > >

Re: [Rpy] RPy and R 2.5.1? 1.0final?

I'm off on a consulting project this week, but will be testing out the latest patch and (hopefully) posting a new release (which will be labeled 1.0.0) this evening, all going well. -G On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:18PM , Alex Mandel wrote: > Skip Montanaro wrote: >> Does Rpy work with R 2.5.1

Re: [Rpy] RPy and R 2.5.1? 1.0final?

Alex & G(reg(ory)?)?, Thanks for the quick (and very impressive) responses. I apologize for not searching the list more completely before posting. I'm the Python guy at work, not the R guy, and therefore not the RPy guy, except when R is about to be upgraded. I heard rumblings today about a pro

Re: [Rpy] RPy and R 2.5.1? 1.0final?

On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:50PM , Skip Montanaro wrote: > Alex & G(reg(ory)?)?, LOL! I use Gregory for formal stuff, Greg for my friends, and sign email with -G. ;-D -G - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Stil