Re: B3+

2025-03-22 Thread Le Bail Armel
At least I will escape to reviewers comments because of a Checkcif alert C :PLAT241 Type_2 Test for unusually high U(eq) as compared with bonded neighboursUsing the B3+ scattering factors instead of neutral B ones, the Boron thermal parameterdecreased from 6.5 to 2.2 A**2.Armelenvoyé : 22 mars 20

Re: B3+

2025-03-22 Thread Matthew Rowles
Try https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/iucr/doi/10.1107/S2053273323010550 And https://journals.iucr.org/paper?ae5125 Matthew On Thu, 20 Mar 2025, 15:47 Luca Lutterotti, wrote: > Nope, I checked what I have and I use Xraylib now in Maud but also there > is only B neutral. Maybe someone can calcul

Re: B3+

2025-03-22 Thread Le Bail Armel
Thanks a lot !Armelenvoyé : 22 mars 2025 à 17:26de : Matthew Rowles à : Luca Lutterotti cc : Le Bail Armel , "Rietveld List (rietveld_l@ill.fr)" objet : Re: B3+Try https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/iucr/doi/10.1107/S2053273323010550Andhttps://journals.iucr.org/paper?ae5125MatthewOn Thu, 20 Mar 2025

Re: B3+

2025-03-22 Thread Masciocchi Norberto
While the availability of the scattering factor for B3+ is certainly a novelty (at least for me), one should be aware that, even in BF4 (where highly electronegative F atoms are bound to Boron), the bonding is mostrly covalent, and may contain a non-negligible contribution of pi-pi backdonation.