Kalpha2

2000-03-28 Thread Oscar Au-Alvarez
Dear Rietvelders, I am looking for the source code of a program that can make the Kalpha2 stripping in an x-ray diagram, in order to include in a package of my lab. Any suggestion is welcomed. Sincerely, Oscar

Re: Kalpha2

2000-03-28 Thread Armel Le Bail
>I am looking for the source code of a program that can make the Kalpha2 >stripping in an x-ray diagram, in order to include in a package of my >lab. Any suggestion is welcomed. There is an answer to that question in the new archives : http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/msg00722.html T

Re: Kalpha2

2000-03-28 Thread L. Cranswick
> I have a related question about the so-called Kalpha3. > Trying to take account of it, I only obtain some slight increase > in the Rp and Rwp, though the fit seems to have improved, > at first glance. > > Has someone a powder pattern available which shows clearly > Kalpha3, and which he was ab

Re: Kalpha2

2000-03-28 Thread Joerg Bergmann
Hi all, On Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:13:11 +0200, Armel Le Bail wrote: >I have a related question about the so-called Kalpha3. >Trying to take account of it, I only obtain some slight increase >in the Rp and Rwp, though the fit seems to have improved, >at first glance. > >Has someone a powder pattern

Re: Kalpha2

2000-03-28 Thread Jim Cline
Hi, At 04:07 PM 3/28/00 +0100, you wrote: Hi all, On Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:13:11 +0200, Armel Le Bail wrote: >I have a related question about the so-called Kalpha3. >Trying to take account of it, I only obtain some slight increase >in the Rp and Rwp, though the fit seems to have improved, >at fi

Re: Kalpha2

2000-03-28 Thread Joerg Bergmann
Dear Jim, On Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:47:51 -0500, Jim Cline wrote: >This is interesting; I've not seen it (nor have I looked for it). > >I have been investigating the "Kalpha3" matter in the course of the certification of SRMs 640c (silicon) and 660a (LaB6) using the FPA code Topas. I'll reporting

Re: Kalpha2

2000-03-28 Thread Armel Le Bail
On the point of view of theory, can the tube-tails and Kalpha3 satellite explanations be reconciled ? No tube-tails theory in the most recent X-ray powder Diffractometry book from Jenkins and Snyder, only Kalpha1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Best, Armel Le Bail - Université du Maine, Laboratoire des Fluorur

Re: Kalpha2

2000-03-28 Thread Jim Cline
Hello, At 09:20 PM 3/28/00 +0200, you wrote: >On the point of view of theory, can the tube-tails and >Kalpha3 satellite explanations be reconciled ? No tube-tails >theory in the most recent X-ray powder Diffractometry book >from Jenkins and Snyder, only Kalpha1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Don't think so; "K

Re: Kalpha2

2000-03-28 Thread Jim Cline
Hello II, At 09:20 PM 3/28/00 +0200, you wrote: >On the point of view of theory, can the tube-tails and >Kalpha3 satellite explanations be reconciled ? No tube-tails >theory in the most recent X-ray powder Diffractometry book >from Jenkins and Snyder, only Kalpha1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. I went back to

Re: Kalpha2

2000-03-28 Thread Dr.Joerg Bergmann
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Jim Cline wrote: > Hello II, > > I went back to the "tube tails" web site mentioned by J"org Bergmann: Has > anyone done a single crystal rocking curve in an attempt to see these > tails? I have just done one to characterize the emission spectrum (as > transmitted thro