Re: Dangling keys/objects after a batch of sequential inserts (for going on 3 days)

2013-07-21 Thread Russell Brown
Hi, On 21 Jul 2013, at 02:09, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: > I (sequentially) made 146204 inserts of unique objects to a single bucket. > Several secondary indices (most with unique values) were set for each object, > one of which was "bucket" = BucketName (to use 2i for listing all keys). There is

Re: Dangling keys/objects after a batch of sequential inserts (for going on 3 days)

2013-07-21 Thread Siraaj Khandkar
On 07/21/2013 07:24 AM, Russell Brown wrote:> Hi, > > On 21 Jul 2013, at 02:09, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: > >> I (sequentially) made 146204 inserts of unique objects to a single >> bucket. Several secondary indices (most with unique values) were set >> for each object, one of which was "bucket" = B

Re: Dangling keys/objects after a batch of sequential inserts (for going on 3 days)

2013-07-21 Thread Siraaj Khandkar
On 07/21/2013 02:20 PM, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: On 07/21/2013 07:24 AM, Russell Brown wrote:> Hi, > > On 21 Jul 2013, at 02:09, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: > > Can you provide an example of the 2i queries you're running? This is how I am testing it: Compare = fun(PID, Bucket) ->

Re: Dangling keys/objects after a batch of sequential inserts (for going on 3 days)

2013-07-21 Thread Siraaj Khandkar
On 07/21/2013 02:42 PM, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: On 07/21/2013 02:20 PM, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: On 07/21/2013 07:24 AM, Russell Brown wrote:> Hi, > > On 21 Jul 2013, at 02:09, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: This is how I am testing it: Compare = fun(PID, Bucket) -> B = Bucket,

Re: Dangling keys/objects after a batch of sequential inserts (for going on 3 days)

2013-07-21 Thread Alexander Sicular
No idea what the problem is but it's been mentioned a few times here that when running these sorts of tests you should always change the bucket name to keep things fresh. -Alexander @siculars http://siculars.posthaven.com Sent from my iRotaryPhone On Jul 21, 2013, at 14:56, Siraaj Khandkar

Re: Dangling keys/objects after a batch of sequential inserts (for going on 3 days)

2013-07-21 Thread Russell Brown
On 21 Jul 2013, at 14:20, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: > On 07/21/2013 07:24 AM, Russell Brown wrote:> Hi, > > > > On 21 Jul 2013, at 02:09, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: > > > >> I (sequentially) made 146204 inserts of unique objects to a single > >> bucket. Several secondary indices (most with unique val

How to create a Jinterface node and cluster for Java Client Benchmark with Basho Bench

2013-07-21 Thread jerryjyuan
I am trying to run some Java client benchmark testing with Basho Bench by following the Riak document: http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/references/appendices/Java-Client-Benchmark/ The Basho Bench tool configuration file for this need requires Jinterface node, see below: %% The list of remote Ja

Re: How to create a Jinterface node and cluster for Java Client Benchmark with Basho Bench

2013-07-21 Thread Russell Brown
On 21 Jul 2013, at 18:34, jerryjyuan wrote: > I am trying to run some Java client benchmark testing with Basho Bench by > following the Riak document: > http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/references/appendices/Java-Client-Benchmark/ > > The Basho Bench tool configuration file for this need requi

Re: Dangling keys/objects after a batch of sequential inserts (for going on 3 days)

2013-07-21 Thread Siraaj Khandkar
On 07/21/2013 04:54 PM, Russell Brown wrote: On 21 Jul 2013, at 14:20, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: On 07/21/2013 07:24 AM, Russell Brown wrote:> Hi, On 21 Jul 2013, at 02:09, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: I (sequentially) made 146204 inserts of unique objects to a single bucket. Several secondary i

Re: Dangling keys/objects after a batch of sequential inserts (for going on 3 days)

2013-07-21 Thread Russell Brown
On 21 Jul 2013, at 19:15, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: > On 07/21/2013 04:54 PM, Russell Brown wrote: >> >> On 21 Jul 2013, at 14:20, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: >> >>> On 07/21/2013 07:24 AM, Russell Brown wrote:> Hi, On 21 Jul 2013, at 02:09, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: > I (sequentia

Re: Dangling keys/objects after a batch of sequential inserts (for going on 3 days)

2013-07-21 Thread Siraaj Khandkar
On 07/21/2013 08:10 PM, Russell Brown wrote: On 21 Jul 2013, at 19:15, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: On 07/21/2013 04:54 PM, Russell Brown wrote: On 21 Jul 2013, at 14:20, Siraaj Khandkar wrote: On 07/21/2013 07:24 AM, Russell Brown wrote:> Hi, On 21 Jul 2013, at 02:09, Siraaj Khandkar wrote

Re: reducing n_val

2013-07-21 Thread Chris Meiklejohn
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Simon Effenberg wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:31:07 -0400 > Chris Meiklejohn wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Simon Effenberg < > seffenb...@team.mobile.de > > > wrote: > > > > > Changing the n_val setting in the default bucket properties will only

Re: Comparing Riak MapReduce and Hadoop MapReduce

2013-07-21 Thread Toby Corkindale
Hi, I experimented with trying to use Riak for some Hadoop-style map-reduce work, and didn't have great results. People on the mailing list have advised that Riak isn't really intended to be used that way. Hopefully others more knowledgeable than I can explain the reasons. Toby On 20/07/13 1

Re: Comparing Riak MapReduce and Hadoop MapReduce

2013-07-21 Thread Jeremiah Peschka
Responses inline. Hopefully they shed some light on the subject. --- Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar Unlimited MCITP: SQL Server 2008, MVP Cloudera Certified Developer for Apache Hadoop On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Xiaoming Gao wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am trying to learn about Ri

Re: Comparing Riak MapReduce and Hadoop MapReduce

2013-07-21 Thread Xiaoming Gao
Thanks, Toby! I actually had similar experience and that's how I came up with the questions. -- View this message in context: http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Comparing-Riak-MapReduce-and-Hadoop-MapReduce-tp4028454p4028475.html Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Comparing Riak MapReduce and Hadoop MapReduce

2013-07-21 Thread Xiaoming Gao
Thanks a lot, Jeremiah! Your answers really help clarify the issues. Just one more question, by "document-based indices", do you mean document-based partitioning for the indices? Because what I found in the online document http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/advanced/search/#Search-KV-and-MapRed

Re: Comparing Riak MapReduce and Hadoop MapReduce

2013-07-21 Thread Jeremiah Peschka
Ah, yeah, I'm mistaken about search partitioning. The docs are correct. I have no idea how the scheduling works. If I had to guess, I would guess that it is a streaming operation. -- Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar Unlimited MCITP: SQL Server 2008, MVP Cloudera Certified Developer for Apa