Re: Split index with Riak 2.0 git (jan 15th) on a single dev node cluster

2014-04-01 Thread John O'Brien
> It does however allow us to change the n-val after linking the index > to the bucket, so I would wager a guess that this might induce the > same issue we saw before. We will test a bit to confirm when we get > the chance, but I welcome sage advice as to the logic behind this. > Scratch the above

Re: Split index with Riak 2.0 git (jan 15th) on a single dev node cluster

2014-04-01 Thread John O'Brien
Ryan, Apologies on the long post delay. We pushed from pre11 to pre20, and figured out the issue. It looks like we had a mismatch between the n-val on the bucket, vs the n-val on the seach_index... Pre20 throws an error telling us to stop being stupid. It does however allow us to change the n-val

Re: Split index with Riak 2.0 git (jan 15th) on a single dev node cluster

2014-01-23 Thread Eric Redmond
Rob, The one second wait is because yokozuna is the glue code (putting it very, very simply) between a Riak cluster and distributed Solr instances. When you write an object to Riak, yokozuna asynchronously fires off an update to the Solr service. Solr is, by default, configured to soft commit w

Re: Split index with Riak 2.0 git (jan 15th) on a single dev node cluster

2014-01-23 Thread Rob Speer
I'm still interested in the question as it applies to Yokozuna. Stable full-text search in Riak will be very important to my company, so I'd want to know what the equivalent behaviors are for Yokozuna queries. Do you have to wait an unspecified amount of time between writing a document and querying

Re: Split index with Riak 2.0 git (jan 15th) on a single dev node cluster

2014-01-23 Thread Luke Bakken
Hi Rob, I believe Ryan meant to wait a second to do a Yokozuna search, not a general Riak K/V operation. There is more information about "read your own writes" here: http://basho.com/tag/configurable-behaviors/ -- Luke Bakken CSE lbak...@basho.com On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Rob Speer wr

Re: Split index with Riak 2.0 git (jan 15th) on a single dev node cluster

2014-01-22 Thread Rob Speer
> ​5. Did you wait at least 1 second before running the queries? I'm not the original poster but I'm now wondering what this question means. Under what circumstances do you have to wait 1 second before query results are available? We want to always be able to run tests on our database rapidly, wh

Re: Split index with Riak 2.0 git (jan 15th) on a single dev node cluster

2014-01-21 Thread Ryan Zezeski
John, 1. What did you use to load the data? Do you have a script? 2. What content-type is the data? 3. Do you see any errors in the log directory? Check error.log and solr.log. 4. Do you get any results for the query q=_yz_err:1 5. Did you wait at least 1 second before running the queries? 6.

Split index with Riak 2.0 git (jan 15th) on a single dev node cluster

2014-01-21 Thread John O'Brien
Issue: When running searchs against a single dev node cluster, pre-populated with 1000 keys, bitcask backend, search=on and a /search/svan?q=* search URI, the solr response is coming back with three different resultsets, 330 values, the other 354, the other 345. The range of keys 0-1000 are split