Hi Greg,
I’m guessing that something isn’t running. Try the following (without the back
checks) and see if you get “pong” for each one:
`riak ping`
`riak-cs ping`
`stanchion ping`
You may or may not need `sudo` to execute the above depending on the user you
are using.
Incidentally, your s3cfg
Hello,
I'm following the instructions for the Docker-ized riak-cs. The Docker
container runs and (appears) healthy.
I am now testing the install with s3cmd as described in the instructions.
I installed s3cmd and am using this .s3cfg file: (the 2 keys I got from
the running container&
Dear All,
We are pleased to announce the release of Riak CS 2.1.2 in coordination with
Stanchion 2.1.2.
As well as the standard bug fixes you'll be expecting, Riak CS 2.1.2 includes
experimental support for signature_v4 authentication and experimental support
for Leveled - the soon
Dear All,
In order to be in time for the start of Code Beam SF 2019, we are launching the
Release Candidate for Riak CS 2.1.2 based on
https://github.com/basho/riak_cs/pull/1351
Owing to the long amount of time that Riak CS has been dormant to development,
we seem to be having a time lag
his has been
resolved in a Riak KV cluster via MDC replication. Should you want to consider
MDC replication, we would highly recommend bi-directional replication as non
bi-directional replication does not propagate tombstones which will lead to
siblings on the standby cluster.
One thing to bea
Anthony,
Your snapshot solution is not bad if you just want a daily version you can roll
back to for disaster recovery.
I presume :
1. You’re running on VM’s
2. You stop the world at the time of the snapshot
Riak CS makes multiple (3 by default) copies of your data and generally
speaking
We are looking to improve on our Riak CS backup strategy. We have had Riak
CS in place for a while and we are currently taking a snapshot of each
server. I'm not sure is this is the best method in terms of
recoverability, space used, timeliness or the backups, etc. What methods
has anyone
Dear All,
As Bet365 has been kind enough to make the Riak KV repl repository available
for the Open Source community, would it be possible to request the Riak CS
equivalent i.e the multibag repository
(https://github.com/basho/riak_cs_multibag.git) to be made Open Source as well,
please
Hi. I'm making small riak cs storage with single node. I configured CS and
KV in accordance with guide. But every file takes up to three times more
space. Is it happening because n_val =3 by default? But why all three
replicas store in one node?
___
Aug 2017, at 08:50, Javier Palacios wrote:
>
>> -Mensaje original-
>> De: riak-users [mailto:riak-users-boun...@lists.basho.com] En nombre de
>> Toby Corkindale
>>
>> I've been actively trying to migrate over to Minio for S3 storage, instead.
>&g
> -Mensaje original-
> De: riak-users [mailto:riak-users-boun...@lists.basho.com] En nombre de
> Toby Corkindale
>
> I've been actively trying to migrate over to Minio for S3 storage, instead.
> Worth a look, and unlike riak CS, has had lots of active develo
Riak CS works, but has some long-standing issues that have never been
resolved.
It doesn't support AWSv4 auth signatures, so some client libraries won't
talk to it at all.
It's quite fragile in respect to its connections to Riak KV -- if KV is
slow to start up, then Riak CS
ote:
>
> > "However there are alternatives under active development."... can you
> please list them? I'm also interested on a CS alternative.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Russell Brown
> wrote:
> > Hi S
ell Brown
> wrote:
> > Hi Stefan
> > On the one hand, even before the demise of Basho, they’d stopped
> supporting Riak CS. On the other, there is an organisation based in Japan,
> but with an international remote team, that supports other CS customers, so
> may well be a choice
t;... can you please
> list them? I'm also interested on a CS alternative.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Russell Brown
> wrote:
> Hi Stefan
> On the one hand, even before the demise of Basho, they’d stopped supporting
> Riak CS. On th
y of people running at, in industry, at reasonable scale.
>
> There’s a genuine market of providers of ex-Basho products, and a
> community of CS users. However there are alternatives under active
> development.
>
> Regards
>
> Russell
>
> On 19 Jul 2017, at 17:27, S
Hi Stefan
On the one hand, even before the demise of Basho, they’d stopped supporting
Riak CS. On the other, there is an organisation based in Japan, but with an
international remote team, that supports other CS customers, so may well be a
choice of support.
The CS code base has not had a huge
Hi everybody,
I'm new to Riak-CS and just joined the group.
We've been exploring Riak-CS now for a couple of days and consider it as a
potential inhouse-alternative to external S3-based storage providers.
Given the last commit was in January 2016, the question rose as to how well
the
Hello,
I would like to ask about the version compatibility of the latest versions
Riak 2.2.3 and Riak-CS 2.1.1
In the document below, the list "Working Version Combinations" has no
description about the latest version of Riak / Riak CS.
http://docs.basho.com/riak/cs/2.1.1/cookboo
Hey all,
I was just bootstrapping a fresh Riak CS cluster, and to my disappointment
ran into the same problem! Stanchion 1.5.0 gets installed, because that's
the one you have in the packagecloud repositories.
It's been two years since I reported this issue!
Toby
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 at
nd instead of 2.x series?
I know that I could use different nodes for TS & CS, but one of the attractive
points of TS was running side by side with CS, instead of setting up a separate
instance (either physical or logical).
Javier Palacios
[1]
http://docs.basho.com/riak/cs/2.1.1/coo
# riak version
2.1.4
root@cachetest001:/home/build# riak-cs version
2.1.1
root@cachetest001:/home/build# stanchion version
1.5.0
root@cachetest001:/home/build# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS
Release:14.04
Codename:
Hi Henry,
Please use "Reply All" so that your responses are sent to the list.
At this point, I recommend looking through the console.log and
error.log files for Riak CS and Riak to see if anything looks obvious
as to the source of the error.
--
Luke Bakken
Engineer
lbak...@basho.c
In addition, the correct field name should be "email", not name.
http://docs.basho.com/riak/cs/2.1.1/cookbooks/configuration/riak-cs/#specifying-the-admin-user
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Luke Bakken wrote:
> Hi Henry,
>
> In the JSON you provided, "name" is fol
Hi Henry,
In the JSON you provided, "name" is followed by a semicolon. Is this a
typo? If not, that could be the cause of the error.
--
Luke Bakken
Engineer
lbak...@basho.com
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Henry- Norbert Cocos
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm trying t
Hello,
I'm trying to run Riak CS on a RPI 3. I got it compiled and running, but
now i'm having troubles.
I already changed the necessary attributes in the riak-cs.conf. I set up
stanchion, riak kv and riak cs.
The attributes i changed include anonymous_user_creat
Henry:
It looks like there is a typo on the following line:
> {add_paths,["/home/pi/src/riak-cs-2.1.1/rel/riak-cs/lib/riak_cs-2.1.1/ebin"$
Your advanced.config file should be similar to this:
> {riak_kv, [
>
> {add_paths,["/home/pi/src/riak-cs-2.1.1/rel/ria
Hi List,
i am having problems running Riak CS on the Raspberry Pi 3. I installed
it from source and made the necassary changes to the "riak.config" and
the "advanced.config".
It currently shows me, that it has issues running the configuration.
I'm also having troubl
Done. Here it is: https://github.com/basho/riak_cs/issues/1333
2017-03-08 16:21 GMT+01:00 Jon Brisbin :
> Might be good to make sure this info is encapsulated into a GitHub issue
>> so we don't loose track of it.
>>
>>
>> In the end, the ONE thing to fix is the cumbersome error message. A
>> prop
>
> Might be good to make sure this info is encapsulated into a GitHub issue
> so we don't loose track of it.
>
>
> In the end, the ONE thing to fix is the cumbersome error message. A propre
> error message would have saved me days of "work"...
> Should I create a new issue for that ?
>
Please do.
here's lots
> to do, beyond just initial config and data on volumes. There's the IP
> addressing and networking issues of bridges to consider, among other
> things.
>
For now we use a single riak node so for us Docker is not much of an issue.
We successfully backuped/restored riak
's the IP addressing and
networking issues of bridges to consider, among other things.
Might be good to make sure this info is encapsulated into a GitHub issue so
we don't loose track of it.
jb
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:16 AM Jean-Marc Le Roux
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I finally found
Hello,
I finally found the problem : the riak and riak-cs config files where
stored in my app container, not in my persistent data container (where the
riak data is).
Whenever I upgraded the app container to a newly generated one, the conf
files and especially the admin user credentials did not
On 6 March 2017 at 03:49, Toby Corkindale wrote:
>
> I tried quite hard to get Riak to work reliably in a Docker container, in
a long-term-use kind of way.
> Riak would never shutdown cleanly, though, and so at startup there would
always be lots of lock files left around that had to be deleted fir
1:12.442 [warning] <0.697.0> Hintfile
> '/var/lib/riak/bitcask/68507889249886074290797726533575766546371837952/2.bitcask.hint'
> invalid
> 2017-02-15 23:41:12.442 [warning] <0.712.0> Hintfile
> '/var/lib/riak/bitcask/15985174158306750667852802857834345527486
> '/var/lib/riak/bitcask/68507889249886074290797726533575766546371837952/2.bitcask.hint'
> invalid
> 2017-02-15 23:41:12.442 [warning] <0.712.0> Hintfile
> '/var/lib/riak/bitcask/159851741583067506678528028578343455274867621888/2.bitcask.hint'
> invalid
> 2017-0
#x27;/var/lib/riak/bitcask/342539446249430371453988632667878832731859189760/2.bitcask.hint'
invalid
All of this is very surprising since I started riak-cs and riak properly.
Then at the end of console.log :
2017-02-15 23:41:13.651 [info] <0.481.0>@riak_core:wait_for_service:498
Wait complete
>> Hi Jean-Marc -
>>
>> Can you provide a complete archive of the log directory? I wonder if
>> another file might have more information.
>>
>> --
>> Luke Bakken
>> Engineer
>> lbak...@basho.com
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Jean-Marc
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > here is the original github issue :
> >
> > https://github.com/basho/riak_cs/issues/1329
> >
> > I'm using riak-cs 2.1.1-1.el6 with stanchion 1.5.0-1.el6 on CentOS 6.8
> in a Docker container.
> > To make the dat
:
>
> https://github.com/basho/riak_cs/issues/1329
>
> I'm using riak-cs 2.1.1-1.el6 with stanchion 1.5.0-1.el6 on CentOS 6.8 in a
> Docker container.
> To make the data persistent, the following directories are mounted from
> outside the container :
>
> /var/log
> /var/
Hello,
here is the original github issue :
https://github.com/basho/riak_cs/issues/1329
I'm using riak-cs 2.1.1-1.el6 with stanchion 1.5.0-1.el6 on CentOS 6.8 in a
Docker container.
To make the data persistent, the following directories are mounted from
outside the container :
- /va
Thanks Luke.
We're using the official Basho Ubuntu packages for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
These don't seem to perform that step; they just start Riak CS
simultaneously with Riak KV.
I'm surprised if we're the only people who hit this. Don't people hit these
issues in your oth
Hi Toby,
The process you use to run "riak-cs start" could use the "riak-admin
wait-for-service riak_kv" command to ensure Riak is ready first:
http://docs.basho.com/riak/kv/2.2.0/using/admin/riak-admin/#wait-for-service
--
Luke Bakken
Engineer
lbak...@basho.com
On Thu, Jan
Hi guys,
I've switched our configuration around, so that Riak CS now talks to
127.0.0.1:8087 instead of the haproxy version.
We have immediately re-encountered the problems that caused us to move to
haproxy.
On start-up, riak takes slightly longer than riak-cs to get ready, and so
riak-cs
gt;> provide credentials used when connecting to various parts of your CS
>> cluster.
>>
>> --
>> Luke Bakken
>> Engineer
>> lbak...@basho.com
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > In Riak CS, t
stored in Riak (and is the
> authoritative location). The values must match in the config files to
> provide credentials used when connecting to various parts of your CS
> cluster.
>
> --
> Luke Bakken
> Engineer
> lbak...@basho.com
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Toby Cork
Bakken
Engineer
lbak...@basho.com
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
> Hi,
> In Riak CS, the admin key and secret is in the config files for both CS
and
> Stanchion.
> Is that the authoritative location for the secrets, or is the
> initially-created admin user
, Toby Corkindale wrote:
> Hi,
> In Riak CS, the admin key and secret is in the config files for both CS and
> Stanchion.
> Is that the authoritative location for the secrets, or is the
> initially-created admin user the source, and those just have to match?
>
> I tried to fig
Hi,
In Riak CS, the admin key and secret is in the config files for both CS and
Stanchion.
Is that the authoritative location for the secrets, or is the
initially-created admin user the source, and those just have to match?
I tried to figure this out from the source code, but my Erlang really
Hi Shaun,
We've been running Riak CS since its early days, so it's possible best
practice has changed.. but I'm sure at some point it was suggested to put a
haproxy between CS and KV to guard against the issues of start-up race
condition, individual KV losses, and brief KV restar
it's up and
running again, CS will continue to deal with new requests without
problems. Any failures to connect to its KV node should be passed to the
client/front-end, which should have all the proper logic for re-attempts or
error reporting.
> I'm surprised more people with hig
Hi Magnus,
I thought that it was recommended AGAINST talking to a co-located Riak on
the same host?
The reason being, the local Riak will take longer to start up than Riak CS,
once you have a sizeable amount of data. This means Riak CS starts up,
fails to connect to Riak, and exits.
You also end
Hi Toby,
As far as I know Riak CS has none of the more advanced retry capabilities
that Riak KV has. However, in the design of CS there seems to be an
assumption that a CS instance will talk to a co-located KV node on the same
host. To achieve high availability, in CS deployments HAProxy is often
Hello all,
Now that we're all back from the end-of-year holidays, I'd like to bump
this question up.
I feel like this has been a long-standing problem with Riak CS not handling
dropped TCP connections.
Last time the cause was haproxy dropping idle TCP connections after too
long, but we s
Hi,
We've been seeing some issues with Riak CS for a while in a specific
situation. Maybe you can advise if we're doing something wrong?
Our setup has redundant haproxy instances in front of a cluster of riak
nodes, for both HTTP and PBC. The haproxy instances share a floating IP
add
what you did there - did you change the
data_root for both bitcask and leveldb backends to use the same directory?
Kind Regards,
Shaun
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Neo wrote:
> Hi
> I'm new to riak and when i trying object storage with riak cs, i got some
> problems.
> i se
Hi,
I'm wondering about pbc_pool_master_workers Riak CS Stats metric. I want to
clear its meaning for myself.
Is this metric means free pbc (to riak) connections in the pool or it
indicates count of pbc connections established to riak without
consideration of its usage and state (I mean
Hi
I'm new to riak and when i trying object storage with riak cs, i got some
problems.
i setup riak kv ,stanchion and riak cs in the same node,and configured
them as files here:
http://docs.basho.com/riak/kv/2.2.0/configuring/
http://docs.basho.com/riak/cs/2.1.1/cookbooks/configuration/
about 4KB/object, with
> some objects being much larger (multiple MB). Is there an easy way to get
> this information from a running cluster so I can give you more accurate
> information?
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Alexander Sicular
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
&
swap. The memory levels (ram + swap) on
>>> each node are currently between 4GB and 5.5GB.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > How many objects (files)? What is the average file size?
>>>
>>
>>> We currently have >30 million objects,
, with
> some objects being much larger (multiple MB). Is there an easy way to get
> this information from a running cluster so I can give you more accurate
> information?
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Alexander Sicular
> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> How many no
ive you more accurate
information?
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Alexander Sicular
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> How many nodes?
> -You should be using 5 minimum if you using the default config. There
> are reasons.
>
> How much ram per node?
> -As you noted, in Riak CS, 1
get this
> information from a running cluster so I can give you more accurate
> information?
>
>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Alexander Sicular
>> wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> How many nodes?
>> -You should be using 5 minimum if you using t
Hi Daniel,
How many nodes?
-You should be using 5 minimum if you using the default config. There
are reasons.
How much ram per node?
-As you noted, in Riak CS, 1MB file chunks are stored in bitcask.
Their key names and some overhead consume memory.
How many objects (files)? What is the average
using leveldb backend instead of the mutli backend for CS?
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Miller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Riak CS cluster up and running, and am anticipating exponential
> growth in the number of key/value pairs over the next few years. From
> reading t
Hi,
The other day I was concerned when I discovered the riak-cs console.log
contained the following:
```
2016-11-17 16:36:10.639 [warning]
<0.155.0>@riak_cs_app:check_admin_creds:76 The admin user's secret is
specified. Ignoring.
2016-11-17 16:36:10.680 [inf
Hi Anthony,
Looking at the linked issue it appears that the 503 response can be
returned erroneously when communication between a Riak CS and Riak
node has an error ("If the first member of the preflist is down").
Is there anything predictable about these errors? You say they come
fro
Hi,
I have a Riak CS cluster up and running, and am anticipating exponential
growth in the number of key/value pairs over the next few years. From
reading the documentation and experience, I've concluded that the default
configuration of CS (with riak_cs_kv_multi_backend) keeps all keys i
We are having a lot of 503 Service Unvailable errors for 1 particular
application client(s) when connecting to Riak-CS. Everything looks fine in
Riak/Riak-CS and when I check the Riak-CS access logs, I can see access from
other applications to other buckets before, during and after the
ithub.com/basho/stanchion/issues/111
My current configuration files are here:
https://gist.github.com/mdaiter/6ce6c00077eaef23ba50820ee1b4a2b3
And I've made Nix expressions for Stanchion, Riak-CS and Basho's version of
Erlang (all of which I'd love to push to nixpkgs!) so my build syst
thony
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Using Riak CS with Hadoop
Riak CS provides an S3 capable API, so theoretically it could work.
Have you tried? If so and you're having issues, follow up here.
--
Luke Bakken
Engineer
lbak...@basho.com
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Valent
Riak CS provides an S3 capable API, so theoretically it could work.
Have you tried? If so and you're having issues, follow up here.
--
Luke Bakken
Engineer
lbak...@basho.com
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Valenti, Anthony
wrote:
> Has anyone setup Hadoop to be able use Raik CS as an S
Has anyone setup Hadoop to be able use Raik CS as an S3 source/destination
instead of or in addition to Amazon S3? Hadoop assumes that it should go to
Amazon S3 by default. Specifically, I am trying to use Hadoop distcp to copy
files to Riak CS.
Thanks,
Anthony
for RiakCS
backend. As documented RiakCS requires its own backend and want me to
define it in advanced.config like below:
```
{riak_kv,
[
{add_paths, ["/usr/lib/riak-cs/lib/riak_cs-{{VERSION}}/ebin"]},
{storage_backend, riak_cs_kv_multi_backend},
{multi_backend_prefix_lis
Hi
I am quite new to RIAK-*. I have setup riak cs on a single server (for
evaluation purposes) with adequate RAM, CPU and high performance storage. I
am using Cosbench to benchmark RIAK-CS using the S3 proxy connection.
Cosbench is also running on the same server (the reasons being I wanted to
Hi Luke,
Cool, understood :) then is not as troublesome as I thought.
Thanks,
Alex
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Luke Bakken wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Alex De la rosa
> wrote:
> > So if the node with Stanchion fatally crashed and can not be recovered I
> can
> > install S
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Alex De la rosa
wrote:
> So if the node with Stanchion fatally crashed and can not be recovered I can
> install Stanchion in another node and this node will get the "master" role?
Yes. There is no concept of "master" or "slave" with Stanchion, since
only one Stan
d only have one active Stanchion process running in your
> >> cluster, since its purpose is to ensure consistent, ordered operations
> >> with regard to users and buckets. You can have a hot-backup if you
> >> configure a load balancer to proxy requests from the
in your
>>> cluster, since its purpose is to ensure consistent, ordered operations
>>> with regard to users and buckets. You can have a hot-backup if you
>>> configure a load balancer to proxy requests from the Riak CS
>>> processes.
>>> --
>&g
rote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> You should only have one active Stanchion process running in your
>> cluster, since its purpose is to ensure consistent, ordered operations
>> with regard to users and buckets. You can have a hot-backup if you
>> configure a load
rocess running in your
> cluster, since its purpose is to ensure consistent, ordered operations
> with regard to users and buckets. You can have a hot-backup if you
> configure a load balancer to proxy requests from the Riak CS
> processes.
> --
> Luke Bakken
> Engineer
>
Hi Alex,
You should only have one active Stanchion process running in your
cluster, since its purpose is to ensure consistent, ordered operations
with regard to users and buckets. You can have a hot-backup if you
configure a load balancer to proxy requests from the Riak CS
processes.
--
Luke
Hi there,
I'm creating a Riak CS cluster and I got some questions about the following
sentence from the documentation:
*Riak KV and Riak CS must be installed on each node in your cluster.
Stanchion, however, needs to be installed on only one node.*
Is this statement saying that only 1 nod
Hi David,
According to the error 'error_verifying_props', it looks like your
Riak KV couldn't be configured for Riak CS. Please make sure if Riak
KV is configured as to allow_mult[1] and backend[2].
[1]:
https://docs.basho.com/riak/cs/2.1.1/cookbooks/configuration/riak-for-c
I am installing Riak CS on Ubuntu 14.04 based on the instructions here:
https://docs.basho.com/riak/cs/2.1.1/cookbooks/installing/
I followed the instructions for configuring /etc/riak-cs/riak-cs.conf:
root@p01:~# diff /etc/riak-cs/riak-cs.conf-ORIG /etc/riak-cs/riak-cs.conf
8c8
< liste
Also, just for reference I am using last riak/riak-cs/stanchion available
on packagecloud
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Jhonny Everson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am setting up a new cluster. I followed all the setup instructions (I
> think). I created admin user as doc says, then
Hi,
I am setting up a new cluster. I followed all the setup instructions (I
think). I created admin user as doc says, then updated riak-cs.conf and
stanchion.conf with generated keys. I get the following when starting:
2016-05-05 01:15:01.167 [error]
> <0.149.0>@riak_cs_app:fetch_and_cache_admin_
Perfect, good to know :) thanks
Yeah, is pretty confusing, I though I was just hitting some old release or
something.
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Justin Pease wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Apologies for the confusion. Riak S2 is a rebranding of Riak CS. So yes,
> they
Alex,
Apologies for the confusion. Riak S2 is a rebranding of Riak CS. So yes,
they are the same.
--
*Justin Pease*
VP, Services
Basho Technologies, Inc.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Alex De la rosa
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I was trying to download Riak S2 to do some testings o
Hi there,
I was trying to download Riak S2 to do some testings on it, but seems the
download page takes you to Riak CS2.1.1:
http://docs.basho.com/riak/cs/2.1.1/downloads/
Are they the same?
Also, in https://packagecloud.io/basho there is no indications of Riak-s2
but Riak-cs.
Is very
There is a nice BitCask formula for creating suggested nodes for a riak-kv
ring. Is there something similar for riak-cs? What are the rules around how
large the key store needs to be in the multi-tenant data store, as I assume
cs is only storing a reference to the large object value. Are there any
quot;moss.access">>,<<"moss.users">>,
<<48,111,58,16,121,107,99,149,64,231,6,8,234,204,240,88,62,111,225>>,
<<"riak-cs-gc">>,
<<48,98,58,16,121,107,99,149,64,231,6,8,234,204,240,88,62,111,225>>]
so i guess, it was not the best idea to retrieve data using the htt
hello,
i'm kind of new to the world of riak but i succeeded to install and
configure riak_2.1.3 (5 instances on 5 machines running debian jessie),
riak-cs_2.1.1, riak-cs-control_1.0.2 and stanchion_2.1.1.
everything works fine but i'm observing a strange behavior:
when i ha
s equal to the server timeout in order to avoid complex
> situations to debug.
> I want to mention again taht I have about 1000 rps to Riak CS, average object
> size is 10 Kb.
It seems to fit a usecase of Riak, not Riak CS, if you don't need S3
API and multi tenancy. Riak CS is
ght 1 maxconn 1024
check port 8090
and so on...
And config for Riak CS:
frontend riakcs
bind193.34.169.1:80
modehttp
option contstats
option httplog
option http-server-close
timeout client 30s
default_backend riakcs_backend
backend riakcs_backend
mode
llo.
> >
> > Thanks for your help Dmitri.
> >
> > Perhaps this is not the correct place to ask this, but maybe someone had
> > have the same problem.
> >
> > I build a test environment with two nodes of RIAK-CS, not in cluster, and
> > I'm tr
build a test environment with two nodes of RIAK-CS, not in cluster, and
> I'm trying to move objects from one to another, to a bucket with the same
> name (testbucket).
> I'm using BOTO, and the copy_key method, but it fails, I guess that problem
> is in the HEAD call, th
Hello.
Thanks for your help Dmitri.
Perhaps this is not the correct place to ask this, but maybe someone had
have the same problem.
I build a test environment with two nodes of RIAK-CS, not in cluster, and
I'm trying to move objects from one to another, to a bucket with the same
Hi,
ha_proxy's timeout settings often causes disconnected errors on a Riak
CS deployment by high work load. termination_stat [1] in tcplog [2]
lets you know if timeout happens or not.
> 2015-11-13 13:13:09.514 [error]
> <0.11264.1387>@riak_cs_wm_common:maybe_create_user:222
Hello.
I have Riak CS cluster with 18 nodes. On each node there is Riak CS and
Riak service and one Stanchion node.
Versions:
Riak 1.4.12
Riak CS 1.5.0
Stanchion 1.5.0
Riak CS and Riak allocated behind HAProxy balancers:
WAN -> HAProxy -> Riak CS nodes -> HAProxy -> Riak nodes.
a
1 - 100 of 551 matches
Mail list logo
