Hi Bob,
Thanks for your reply.
> We've looked at these recently and they're not exactly prime time.
Yes, seems that way, although the jury has mixed assessments. Ryan rejected
0MQ for NodeJS, while Zed Shaw used 0MQ to build Mongrel2.
Kind Regards
Neville
On 5 December 2010 19:49, Bob Ippolit
We've looked at these recently and they're not exactly prime time.
They don't even compile on Mac OS X without a lot of prodding, at
least with our configuration. I think they also require some
development version of 0mq. That said, would be more than happy if
someone fixes these problems and build
that should be "RabbitMQ *not* required"
On 5 December 2010 19:27, Neville Burnell wrote:
> And 0MQ has Erlang bindings anyhow, so rabbitMQ now required!
>
> http://www.zeromq.org/bindings:erlang
>
>
> On 5 December 2010 18:04, Neville Burnell wrote:
>
>> A quick follow up - it seems RabbitMQ no
And 0MQ has Erlang bindings anyhow, so rabbitMQ now required!
http://www.zeromq.org/bindings:erlang
On 5 December 2010 18:04, Neville Burnell wrote:
> A quick follow up - it seems RabbitMQ now supports 0MQ [1][2] which might
> be a good fit with Riak
>
> From the blog post [1]:
> "0MQ is bundle
A quick follow up - it seems RabbitMQ now supports 0MQ [1][2] which might be
a good fit with Riak
>From the blog post [1]:
"0MQ is bundled with OpenPGM library which implements a reliable mutlicast
protocol called PGM. The r0mq bridge thus allows to multicast messages from
RabbitMQ broker to the c
