And 0MQ has Erlang bindings anyhow, so rabbitMQ now required! http://www.zeromq.org/bindings:erlang
On 5 December 2010 18:04, Neville Burnell <neville.burn...@gmail.com> wrote: > A quick follow up - it seems RabbitMQ now supports 0MQ [1][2] which might > be a good fit with Riak > > From the blog post [1]: > "0MQ is bundled with OpenPGM library which implements a reliable mutlicast > protocol called PGM. The r0mq bridge thus allows to multicast messages from > RabbitMQ broker to the clients (0MQ clients to be precise — AMQP has no > multicast support). This kind of functionality is extremely useful in > scenarios where a lot of identical data is passed to many boxes on the LAN. > If a separate copy of each datum is sent to each subscriber, you can easily > exceed capacity of your network. With multicast, data is sent once only to > all the subscribers thus keeping the bandwidth usage constant even when the > number of subscribers grows." > > [1] http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/10/18/rabbitmq0mq-bridge/ > <http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/10/18/rabbitmq0mq-bridge/>[2] > https://github.com/rabbitmq/rmq-0mq > > <https://github.com/rabbitmq/rmq-0mq> > On 5 December 2010 17:32, Neville Burnell <neville.burn...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Does/can Riak use PGM [1] for replicating writes ? >> >> It seems PGM would be more efficient when the number of physical nodes >> starts to get high. >> >> Just curious! >> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatic_General_Multicast >> > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
