OK, I got it working by using MD5, thanks!
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Magnus Kessler wrote:
> On 8 June 2016 at 00:40, satish bhatti wrote:
>
>> I am trying to run Riak Control for my Riak 1.4.12 setup on OSX. I
>> followed the instructions here:
>>
>> http://docs.basho.com/riak/1.4.12/op
On 8 June 2016 at 00:40, satish bhatti wrote:
> I am trying to run Riak Control for my Riak 1.4.12 setup on OSX. I
> followed the instructions here:
>
> http://docs.basho.com/riak/1.4.12/ops/advanced/riak-control/
>
> for setting it up. When I try to access:
>
> https://localhost:8069/admin
>
>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Bruno René Santos
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a cluster of 6 machines and wanted to check them using riak control.
> I tried to enabled it on node-01 (riak.conf => riak_control = on), restart
> riak on that node. But nothing appears on port 8069... where else can i
> c
This bug [1] has been fixed on Riak Control's ‘develop' branch; however, on OS
X it still doesn’t report correct results because of an open issue [2] filed
against Erlang/OTP.
[1] https://github.com/basho/riak_control/pull/111
[2] https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/92
- Chris
--
Christop
Hi Nicolas,
As we are still investigating another bug with the memory reporting [1], I
would wait for the next packaged release of Riak.
- Chris
[1] https://github.com/basho/riak_control/issues/118
--
Christopher Meiklejohn
Software Engineer
Basho Technologies, Inc.
On Monday, September
This bug has been fixed on the master and 1.4 branches, but has not made it
into
one of our packages yet.
My apologies for the trouble.
- Chris
--
Christopher Meiklejohn
Software Engineer
Basho Technologies, Inc.
On Monday, September 30, 2013 at 11:36 AM, nicolasc wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
On Wednesday 18 September 2013 11:55:49 Christopher Meiklejohn wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Thomas Stein wrote:
> > hello.
> >
> > I'm playing around with riak control. Nice tool. One problem i have right
> > now. Memory Usage of the nodes is not shown. See screenshot at
On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Thomas Stein wrote:
> hello.
>
> I'm playing around with riak control. Nice tool. One problem i have right
> now.
> Memory Usage of the nodes is not shown. See screenshot at
>
> http://meine-oma.de/riakcontrol.png
>
> Someone has an idea whats caus
I've opened an issue for this:
https://github.com/basho/riak_control/issues/156
Thanks!
- Chris
--
Christopher Meiklejohn
Software Engineer
Basho Technologies, Inc.
On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Guido Medina wrote:
> Now it is working, maybe to be added to a wish list, a
Thanks for the quick response,
Now it is working, maybe to be added to a wish list, a flag to
"enforce_secure_transport" and by default be true, I'm quite sure many
users use SSH tunnels for those things, no point on loading certificates
and stuff if your servers are well protected and there i
On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Guido Medina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have Riak control running at HTTP port on localhost?
> Assuming security is provided by SSH tunnels.
> If so what is needed to be done at app.config? I enabled Riak control
> but it is redirecting me to
Hi Toby,
The error you are seeing is a bug which I'm working to resolve. We're
currently in the process of reviewing a test to ensure against possible
regressions, [1] two bug fixes, [2] [3] and a modification to the copy to
clarify what "incompatible" means. [4]
For now, it's safe to assume tha
On 06/08/13 07:51, Paul Ingalls wrote:
Hope you all don't get pissed for me spamming the list….;)
I upgraded my cluster to 1.4.1 in hopes the levelDB changes may help.
The cluster is now up and running, however Riak Control is complaining:
The following nodes are currently incompatible with R
Thanks Chris! Hopefully its just a rookie mistake...
Paul Ingalls
Founder & CEO Fanzo
p...@fanzo.me
@paulingalls
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulingalls
On Aug 6, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Chris Meiklejohn wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I just wanted to let you know that I'm currently investigating this and
Hi Paul,
I just wanted to let you know that I'm currently investigating this and
will get back to you shortly.
I've opened the following issue for tracking it:
https://github.com/basho/riak_control/issues/128
In addition, in retrospect I've realized that using the "incompatible"
language is a b
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:36 AM, rengasamy@gmail.com <
rengasamy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it possible to add a node to cluster only for enabling riak control and
> not for other transaction .
>
Unfortunately, not at this point. The node running Riak Control has to be
an active member of th
Perfect, thank you!
--
Christopher Meiklejohn
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Pavel Kogan wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> Thanks a lot, it is works now.
>
> Pavel
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Christopher Meiklejohn
> mailto:cmeiklej...@basho.com)> wrote:
> > Hi Pa
Hi Christopher,
Thanks a lot, it is works now.
Pavel
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Christopher Meiklejohn <
cmeiklej...@basho.com> wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> Did you get this sorted out yet?
>
> It looks like your SSL configuration has the certificate pointing towards
> the signing request, a
Hi Pavel,
Did you get this sorted out yet?
It looks like your SSL configuration has the certificate pointing towards the
signing request, and not the actual certificate file. The cacertfile is only
necessary if your certificate issuer requires the use of an intermediary
certificate.
Let me
Greeting,
*Output of iptables --list*
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
*
*
Seems to
Ok, I will try, though I don't understand why I should have problem with
port 8069 if I don't have any read/write problem via port 8098.
Thanks,
Pavel
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Evan Kinney wrote:
> CentOS 6 comes with iptables enabled by default. You should either flush
> the tables, s
CentOS 6 comes with iptables enabled by default. You should either flush the
tables, save, and restart the iptables/ip6tables daemons, or add rules for the
ports you have Riak bound on.
/ek
On Sep 21, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Pavel Kogan
wrote:
> Well, should be something else. I tried both ways an
Well, should be something else. I tried both ways and it still doesn't work.
Can be blocked by firewall? I am not Linux expert.
Thanks,
Pavel
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Evan Kinney wrote:
> 0.0.0.0 will bind Riak to all configured IPs, so any routable IP assigned
> to the machine should
0.0.0.0 will bind Riak to all configured IPs, so any routable IP assigned to
the machine should work.
/ek
On Sep 21, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Wes James
wrote:
> If your not directly on the server then you need to change the 0.0.0.0 to
> your server actual IP address then put in https://your_ip:8069
If your not directly on the server then you need to change the 0.0.0.0 to
your server actual IP address then put in https://your_ip:8069/admin in
your local browser - of course after restarting riak.
wes
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Pavel Kogan wrote:
> Probably I don't get something.
> Add
Probably I don't get something.
Address: https://127.0.0.1:8069/admin assuming browsing on localhost.
However Riak is running on Linux server without Gnome/KDE.
Regards,
Pavel
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Wes James wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Pavel Kogan wrote:
>
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Pavel Kogan wrote:
> Hi fellows,
>
> I have cluster of 2 physical Riak nodes (I know it is not enough) running
> on CentOS 6.
> Now I am trying to configure Riak control - did everything according to
> instructions:
>
> 1) Enabled HTTPS in app.config
>* {
David,
If you're running 1.2, you'll have to do 'riak-admin cluster plan'
followed by 'riak-admin cluster commit' on the command line. I don't
think Riak Control has been updated to accommodate the new 1.2 cluster
membership changes.
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 4:50 AM, David Montgomery
wrote:
> Hi,
Hey Theo,
On Jun 1, 2012, at 7:12, Theo Bot wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm fairly new to riak. However I managed to setup a 5 node riak cluster on 5
> centos servers. But when I look at the ring view in riak-control I see much
> more. Like 65.
>
> Can someone please explain?
>
Congrats on getting th
Hi Theo,
The "Cluster View" screen your viewing in Riak Control displays the
partitions in your riak cluster and the physical node that has claimed each
partition. By default a riak cluster has 64 paritions, you'll notice we
start counting at 0.
See: "The Riak Cluster" section on the "what is Ria
Thank you Jeff! Will try that tomorrow at work.
Sent from my iPhone
On 22/02/2012, at 17:19, Jeffrey Massung wrote:
> Rohman,
>
> You'll also need to enable HTTPS (and SSL) in the riak_core section of the
> app.config file. Also, don't forget to change the port used for HTTPS to
> something
Rohman,
You'll also need to enable HTTPS (and SSL) in the riak_core section of the
app.config file. Also, don't forget to change the port used for HTTPS to
something different (I personally use 8069).
Note the required changes to the app.config file in the README:
https://github.com/basho/riak
That's terrific. Thank you.
-J
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:08 PM, David Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jason J. W. Williams
> wrote:
> > How does Riak Control differ from the management tools included in the
> > enterprise version?
>
> Riak Control is a redesign of those manage
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jason J. W. Williams
wrote:
> How does Riak Control differ from the management tools included in the
> enterprise version?
Riak Control is a redesign of those management tools and a release of
that functionality to Open Source. We want it to be drop-dead easy for
Ah, OK thanks. I misread in the Riak Control README of the availability of
the self signed certs in Riak 1.0.2 and later as an indication Riak Control
was available in 1.0.2.
--
Jeremy
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> Riak control will be part of the 1.1 series, it is
Jeremy,
When you upgrade, your /etc/app.config file isn't altered (we don't want to
blow away your previous settings). With a fresh install, there will be a new
section in app.config for riak_control, which you can also manually add. But,
as Andrew already replied, riak_control will be "offici
How does Riak Control differ from the management tools included in the
enterprise version?
-J
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> Riak control will be part of the 1.1 series, it is not present in 1.0.2
> or any of the 1.0 releases.
>
> Andrew
>
> __
Riak control will be part of the 1.1 series, it is not present in 1.0.2
or any of the 1.0 releases.
Andrew
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
38 matches
Mail list logo
