c IP
> address so all queries to this address are shared amount the nodes in the
> cluster. Right? I will try this.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Antonio Rohman Fernandez [mailto:roh...@mahalostudio.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 10:55 AM
> To: Kevin Burton
&g
cEwan;
Subject: Re: Cluster setup
Well, I don't work with VMs, for me 1 node = 1 full server
Sent from my iPhone
On 12/12/2012, at 17:43, "Kevin Burton" wrote:
> But when setting up a cluster on VM's there is only one public
> address. So in your scenario there is only IP no
2, 2012 10:37 AM
> To: Kevin Burton
> Cc: Shane McEwan; riak-users@lists.basho.com
> Subject: Re: Cluster setup
>
> You have to understand that there is no master node in Riak, all nodes are
> equal, so you have as many entrypoint IPs as servers:
>
> http://IP1:8089/riak
> http:/
Antonio Rohman Fernandez [mailto:roh...@mahalostudio.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 10:37 AM
To: Kevin Burton
Cc: Shane McEwan; riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Cluster setup
You have to understand that there is no master node in Riak, all nodes are
equal, so you have as many en
that)?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shane McEwan [mailto:sh...@mcewan.id.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 10:12 AM
> To: Kevin Burton
> Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
> Subject: Re: Cluster setup
>
> Looks good to me!
>
> On 12/12/12 16:10,
n.id.au]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 10:12 AM
To: Kevin Burton
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Cluster setup
Looks good to me!
On 12/12/12 16:10, Kevin Burton wrote:
> So now I have
>
> [azureuser@bsicentos3 ~]$ sudo riak-admin member-status Attempting to
> restart scri
'riak@10.79.90.11'
---
Valid:3 / Leaving:0 / Exiting:0 / Joining:0 / Down:0
Does this look right?
-Original Message-
From: Shane McEwan [mailto:sh...@mcewan.id.au]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:58 AM
To: Kevin Burton
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: R
ving:0 / Exiting:0 / Joining:0 / Down:0
Does this look right?
-Original Message-
From: Shane McEwan [mailto:sh...@mcewan.id.au]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:58 AM
To: Kevin Burton
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Cluster setup
Run the join commands on the OTHER machines
it matter where cluster pan and cluster commit are
run from?
-Original Message-
From: Shane McEwan [mailto:sh...@mcewan.id.au]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:58 AM
To: Kevin Burton
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Cluster setup
Run the join commands on the OTHER machines . .
in the cluster.*
-Original Message-
From: Shane McEwan [mailto:sh...@mcewan.id.au]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:43 AM
To: Kevin Burton
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Cluster setup
There's no need to join the "master" to itself. Just join the other
nodes to t
12, 2012 9:43 AM
To: Kevin Burton
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Cluster setup
There's no need to join the "master" to itself. Just join the other nodes to
the master.
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
.id.au]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:26 AM
To: Kevin Burton
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Cluster setup
The join command needs to be given a node name and IP of a machine already
in the cluster.
So if you have machines:
riak@10.79.110.52
riak@10.79.108.25
riak@10.79.90.11
Then
-name riak@10.79.108.25
It doesn't seem that you can join a node to itself.
-Original Message-
From: Shane McEwan [mailto:sh...@mcewan.id.au]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:26 AM
To: Kevin Burton
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Cluster setup
The join command need
eplicas will be on distinct nodes
Transfers resulting from cluster changes: 32
32 transfers from 'riak@10.79.110.52' to 'riak@10.79.108.25'
-Original Message-
From: Shane McEwan [mailto:sh...@mcewan.id.au]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 8:58 AM
To: Kevin Burton
Cc: r
replicas will be on distinct nodes
Transfers resulting from cluster changes: 32
32 transfers from 'riak@10.79.110.52' to 'riak@10.79.108.25'
-Original Message-
From: Shane McEwan [mailto:sh...@mcewan.id.au]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 8:58 AM
To: Kevin Burton
C
On 12/12/12 14:32, Kevin Burton wrote:
Good catch! Thank you. If I have three machines that take up ports
8098,8099, and 8100 what do you suggest the handoff port should be? When is
it used?
No problem!
Each machine can use the same ports as the other machines. You just
can't use the same po
[mailto:sh...@mcewan.id.au]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 8:25 AM
To: Kevin Burton
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Cluster setup
On 12/12/12 14:15, Kevin Burton wrote:
> Thank you but this command didn't return anything:
OK, perhaps you're using the same port
-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Cluster setup
On 12/12/12 14:15, Kevin Burton wrote:
> Thank you but this command didn't return anything:
OK, perhaps you're using the same port for different functions in Riak?
In particular, I see you're using 8099 for your http port but i
On 12/12/12 14:15, Kevin Burton wrote:
Thank you but this command didn't return anything:
OK, perhaps you're using the same port for different functions in Riak?
In particular, I see you're using 8099 for your http port but in my
setup 8099 is used for "handoff_port".
Here's the ports I'm u
riginal Message-
From: riak-users [mailto:riak-users-boun...@lists.basho.com] On Behalf Of
Shane McEwan
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 3:07 AM
To: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Cluster setup
On 11/12/12 19:11, Kevin Burton wrote:
> Thank you. I have restarted the server s
On 11/12/12 19:11, Kevin Burton wrote:
Thank you. I have restarted the server several times and I don't see riak
running with 'ps ax'. The configuration is set to come up on reboot so there
shouldn't be any other instance of riak around to run.
It's not necessarily another Riak instance but som
.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:09 PM
To: Kevin Burton
Cc: 'Sean Carey'; riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Cluster setup
Hey,
'eaddrinuse' from your previous mail suggests that the address your binding
to is already in use. Maybe riak is already running? O
Hey,
'eaddrinuse' from your previous mail suggests that the address your binding to
is already in use. Maybe riak is already running? Or something else is bound to
the address?
Cheers
Russell
On 11 Dec 2012, at 19:06, Kevin Burton wrote:
> Any more information on this or something I can do
Any more information on this or something I can do to help diagnose my own
problem?
Again app.config looks like:
app.config looks like:
[
%% Riak Client APIs config
{riak_api, [
%% pb_backlog is the maximum length to which the queue of pending
%% connec
I cannot see the problem it is 10.79.110.52. Isn't that the address of
this node?
I looked at the end of erlang.log.a and see the following errors:
=
= LOGGING STARTED Mon Dec 10 21:03:57 UTC 2012
=
Exec: /usr/lib64/riak/erts-5.9.1/bin/erlexec -boot
/usr/lib64/riak/releases/1.2.
Look at the section in your config called pb_ip. The ip is wrong.
On Monday, December 10, 2012 at 4:02 PM, rkevinbur...@charter.net wrote:
> I moved on to the next step and from the "seed node" I execute 'sudo
> riak-admin cluster join riak@10.79.110.52 (mailto:riak@10.79.110.52)' and I
> g
I moved on to the next step and from the "seed node" I execute 'sudo
riak-admin cluster join riak@10.79.110.52' and I get
Attempting to restart script through sudo -H -u riak
Node riak@10.79.110.52 is not reachable!
I can ping the node:
PING 10.79.110.52 (10.79.110.52) 56(84) bytes of data.
all and /etc/init.d support, you should
> > > > > > really just be installing the packages.
> > > > > > http://s3.amazonaws.com/downloads.basho.com/riak/CURRENT/rhel/6/riak-1.2.1-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> > > > > > is the package for Centos 6 found here
>
s3.amazonaws.com/downloads.basho.com/riak/CURRENT/rhel/6/riak-1.2.1-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>> is the package for Centos 6 found here
>>>>> http://basho.com/resources/downloads/. Building from source is there for
>>>>> those who need a feature not currently in a release, want
a release, want to make
>> additions to Riak, or are on an unsupported platform.
>>
>> -Jared
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, wrote:
>>
>>> I am looking at http://docs.basho.com/riak/**latest/cookbooks/Basic-**
>>> Cluster-Set
t;>> http://basho.com/resources/downloads/. Building from source is there for
>>> those who need a feature not currently in a release, want to make additions
>>> to Riak, or are on an unsupported platform.
>>>
>>> -Jared
>>>
>>>
>&g
>
>> I am looking at http://docs.basho.com/riak/**latest/cookbooks/Basic-**
>> Cluster-Setup/<http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/cookbooks/Basic-Cluster-Setup/>which
>> provides me with a lot of information. But I have one question. I
>> have a source distribution an
who need a feature not currently in a release, want to make additions
> to Riak, or are on an unsupported platform.
>
> -Jared
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, wrote:
>> I am looking at
>> http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/cookbooks/Basic-Cluster-Setup/ which
>
there for
those who need a feature not currently in a release, want to make additions
to Riak, or are on an unsupported platform.
-Jared
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, wrote:
> I am looking at http://docs.basho.com/riak/**latest/cookbooks/Basic-**
> Cluster-Setup/<http://docs.basho
I am looking at
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/cookbooks/Basic-Cluster-Setup/ which
provides me with a lot of information. But I have one question. I have a
source distribution and I have already done 'make rel'. Once I have
performed all of the steps outlined in setting up a clus
Hi,
We are facing 500 Internal Server Error for a search queries and amazingly it
fails only in cluster mode (i.e. with more than one riak node running).
We have following single node setup to start with:
$ ./bin/riak-admin member-status
= Membership =
This has been there all along (albeit not named "EC2" specifically):
http://wiki.basho.com/Network-Security-and-Firewall-Configurations.html
Sean Cribbs
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
http://basho.com/
On Feb 7, 2011, at 6:28 AM, Abhishek Kona wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the help f
Thanks a lot for the help folks.
And sorry for the late reply.
I could set the ports up after including
{kernel, [
{inet_dist_listen_min, 8000},
{inet_dist_listen_max, 8088}
]}
in my app.config.
It would be great if there could be a page to guide ec2 setup of riak o
ation and
> initialization at node creation time, so in normal production use will not
> need to SSH into the nodes.
>
> __
> Eamonn
>
>
>
> On 2/4/11 9:00 AM, riak-users-requ...@lists.basho.com wrote:
>>
>> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:33:20 +0530 From: Abhishek
in normal production use will
not need to SSH into the nodes.
__
Eamonn
On 2/4/11 9:00 AM, riak-users-requ...@lists.basho.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:33:20 +0530 From: Abhishek Kona
To: Sean Cribbs Cc:
"riak-users@lists.basho.com" Subject: Re:
Riak Cluster
On 02/02/11 8:38 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
Abhishek,
First, make sure all of your nodes are in the same security group.
Yes, both the machines are on the same security group ( which has only
the ports 8098, 8099, 8087).
Second, check that your OS doesn't have an additional firewall installed
You need to open the extra erlang ports in your security group. We do the
following:
In the security group, open up TCP port 4369 to 10.0.0.0/8, and ports
8000-8089 (or other range) to 10.0.0.0/8 also. This would allow any instance
(even those that are not yours) to access those ports, so we block
Hi All,
In my past experiences with distributed Erlang on systems I've put together,
the first thing I check when two nodes cannot ping each other is whether the
erlang cookie is the same on both nodes (and sometimes an erlang hosts file is
needed).
I know in the dev setup of riak (3 nodes - d
Hey,
epmd -name gives the following on the nodes.
#node1
ubuntu@node2:~$ sudo epmd -names
epmd: up and running on port 4369 with data:
name riak at port 34358
#node2
ubuntu@node1:~$ sudo epmd -names
epmd: up and running on port 4369 with data:
name riak at port 42643
I can telnet to the
Hey,
So that shows distributed erlang is not working, next step is to work out
why. The erlang emulator (beam) uses ports for distributed erlang in
addition to the ones riak uses.
You can see which ports using the erlang port mapper. It sits on a well
known port and sets up all the other connec
Hi.
Sorry about that,
I am getting "pang" as a reply.
But is this a network issue?
As I said before I can telnet on to the machines on the Riak ports.
What can be the issues?
Again ,Thanks for all the quick help
-Abhishek Kona
On 02/02/11 10:33 PM, Jon Meredith wrote:
Hi Abhishek,
It look
Hi Abhishek,
You need to add a period (".") to the end of the statements before they will
execute. Can you try the ping command again?
Thanks,
Dan
Daniel Reverri
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
d...@basho.com
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Abhishek Kona wrote:
> Hi Jon
> Thanks
Hi Jon
Thanks for the quick reply.
On 02/02/11 10:33 PM, Jon Meredith wrote:
Hi Abhishek,
It looks like distributed erlang isn't working between the nodes so
the join fails.
You can test it by bringing the nodes up in console mode and executing
$ riak console
[some logging status messages]
Hi Abhishek,
It looks like distributed erlang isn't working between the nodes so the join
fails.
You can test it by bringing the nodes up in console mode and executing
$ riak console
[some logging status messages]
Eshell V5.7.5 (abort with ^G)
(dev2@127.0.0.1)1> net_adm:ping('dev1@127.0.0.1').
On 02/02/11 8:38 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
Abhishek,
First, make sure all of your nodes are in the same security group.
Yes, both the machines are on the same security group ( which has only
the ports 8098, 8099, 8087).
Second, check that your OS doesn't have an additional firewall
installed (
Abhishek,
First, make sure all of your nodes are in the same security group. Second,
check that your OS doesn't have an additional firewall installed (iptables, for
example). Third, you might consider doing what the Chef recipe for Riak does
and limit the ports that Erlang uses for distribute
Hi folks
I am trying to set up a Riak cluster on EC2.
Each time I issue a command :
$ sudo riak-admin join riak@10.130.149.253
It fails :
Attempting to restart script through sudo -u riak
Node riak@10.130.149.253 is not reachable!
Netstat on both the machines says the ports are running fine
52 matches
Mail list logo
