Hi,
I'm need to use faceting for some of the data in Riak, I know we can use it
with Search.Options, but I couldn't find a decent way to use that. I was
looking at any test cases, but couldn't find any. If some body used it, can
you please post a gist or sample here.
I just need to use enable face
ble to help with that. Another
> option would be to use a Solr client and query Solr directly rather
> than going through Riak.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian Roach
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Santi Kumar wrote:
> > Hi
> > We have a Composite pojo wh
Hi
We have a Composite pojo which we are indexing into Riak search. If I see
the structure of the object in solr web console, it shows as nested json.
Through java client when we query it returns the Map and having
difficulties in converting it into java object. Is there a way in riak-java
client t
n_val is 3 for us and we have 3 nodes
On Apr 1, 2015 1:21 PM, "Vitaliy E" <13vitam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've just joined the list, and am a bit late to the party. Sorry about
> that. Thought I would contribute an answer anyway.
>
> Santi, what is you n_val?
>
> I observed the
Hi Zeeshan,
We have typically seen this issue when we have lots of indexes created in
that instance. On a t2.medium machine we already have around 512+ indexes
created in data folder. In such case, if we trying to create any new
indexes it's taking time. Association of Index to Bucket is failing e
.org
> twitter => @zeeshanlakhani
>
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Santi Kumar wrote:
>
> But in our case we didnt have spaces in keys. All our keys are UUID's so I
> wouldn't suspect that. AAE I haven't verified .
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Joh
engineer at @basho |
> org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org
> twitter => @zeeshanlakhani
>
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Santi Kumar wrote:
>
> But in our case we didnt have spaces in keys. All our keys are UUID's so I
> wouldn't suspect that. AA
x27;spaces-in-keys' issue... Once we cleaned those up, things were
> great again.
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Santi Kumar wrote:
>
>> Raik 2.0.0
>> On Mar 5, 2015 12:31 AM, "Christopher Meiklejohn"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> &g
Raik 2.0.0
On Mar 5, 2015 12:31 AM, "Christopher Meiklejohn"
wrote:
>
> > On Mar 4, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Santi Kumar wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > We are running into a strange issue with Riak Search. Our setup is with
> 3 nodes of Riak (with search enabled) in
Hi,
We are running into a strange issue with Riak Search. Our setup is with 3
nodes of Riak (with search enabled) in 3 different ec2 instances behind
ELB. App server talks to the cluster through ELB. We are querying for list
of objects through *:* query instead of list bucket keys and every time t
f the
object state. I have modified accordingly. Is there any restrictions on the
naming of the 2i index?
Thanks
Santi
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Christopher Meiklejohn <
cmeiklej...@basho.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 26, 2015, at 5:48 PM, Santi Kumar wrote:
>
> Yes. I'm
odify-write, the tag value exist all the time.
Thanks
Santi
On Jan 26, 2015 7:46 PM, "Christopher Meiklejohn"
wrote:
>
> > On Jan 26, 2015, at 09:45, Santi Kumar wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> > I'm defining a field of an object as 2i index with @RiakIndex. While
Hi
I'm defining a field of an object as 2i index with @RiakIndex. While
creating the object I initialised both the values and stored the object
against the key of that object and stored against the index.
In a separate thread another field of the object is updated where I dont
have handle to the 2
ve only got so many threads and you prob don't want
> 1000 sockets being created at once. Best suggestion is to adjust up
> the number of simultaneous inflight and measure it.
>
> Thanks,
> - Roach
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Santi Kumar wrote:
> > Brain
I have installed Riak in ec2 and kept it wide open for inbound connections.
>From the source instance, We have configured outbound ports 8087 an 8098 to
the public IP of Riak Instance.
Any other ports are required? I'm using python and curl clients but still
not able to connect on both the ports
threads and you prob don't want
> 1000 sockets being created at once. Best suggestion is to adjust up
> the number of simultaneous inflight and measure it.
>
> Thanks,
> - Roach
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Santi Kumar wrote:
> > Brain
> > I"m u
Brain
I"m using Riak Client 2.0.0 and Riak 2.0.2.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Brian Roach wrote:
> Santi -
>
> Which version of the Java client?
>
> Thanks,
> - Roach
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Santi Kumar wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >
Hi
We are using java client for accessing Riak KV/Search. For some use cases,
we go to search, get the keys and access the data from Riak. There might be
a case where we might get 1000's of keys. So want to understand what is the
impact of that on multiget and how does it scale.
We were using RD
Sean,
As at any given point of time, there could be multiple versions of a given
entry in Riak, how does riak search manages that? Which version of the
entry is indexed with solr?
Thanks
Santi
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
> The version of Solr bundled with Riak 2.0.4 is 4
your Solr schema. Also, please check to ensure that your schema has
> all required _yz_* fields.
> --
> Luke Bakken
> Engineer
> lbak...@basho.com
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Santi Kumar wrote:
> > Sorry Luke, I pasted the content in a file and ran the comma
kken wrote:
> Please run your JSON document through the extractor to ensure that
> it's being parsed correctly:
>
> http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/advanced/search/#Extractors
>
> curl -XPUT http://localhost:8098/search/extract \
> -H 'Content-Type: applicatio
t;:null,"enable_save_as":false,"disable_watermark":true,"disable_spotlight":true,"enable_screen_capture":false,"disable_onetime_use":true}
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Luke Bakken wrote:
> Can you retrieve the object using "curl" a
}
On Jan 9, 2015 9:42 PM, "Luke Bakken" wrote:
> How are you storing these objects? What "Content-Type" is being used?
> --
> Luke Bakken
> Engineer
> lbak...@basho.com
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Santi Kumar wrote:
> > Hi,
> > We
Hi,
We are having issues with Riak Search custom schema. Application has
multiple POJO's and we are using Java client to write into RIakKV.
Configured custom solr schema with indexed fields from all POJOs. After
adding the "Catch-All" field, solr is not indexing any fields from any of
the Pojo.
No
Search query.
>
> --
> Luke Bakken
> Engineer / CSE
> lbak...@basho.com
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:25 AM, Santi Kumar wrote:
> > HI I'm having some consistency issues with Riak Search.
> >
> > I have configured Riak Search and enabled search for a spec
HI I'm having some consistency issues with Riak Search.
I have configured Riak Search and enabled search for a specific bucket. In
one of the service layer methods, I"m storing the object into the Riak and
doing some more updates and immediately trying to search on a attribute of
the object. It'
HI
While creating a index and bucket in Java client, I was getting this error.
I remember getting the same earlier but I didn't remember. Can anyone throw
some light on that. When do we get this error and how to resolve this?
Thanks
Santi
___
riak-users
/advanced/search-schema/
> Creating an index via HTTP:
> http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/using/search/#Simple-Setup
> --
> Luke Bakken
> Engineer / CSE
> lbak...@basho.com
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Santi Kumar wrote:
> > Hi Luke,
> > Yes I could
cated in
> /var/log/riak or dev*/log (if you're using a devrel). In particular,
> look in the solr.log file.
> --
> Luke Bakken
> Engineer / CSE
> lbak...@basho.com
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Santi Kumar wrote:
> > Hi
> > I'm tying to us
Hi
I'm tying to use Riak Search 2.0 with java client. Couldn't find any good
documentation around that so I'm trying on my own. I've created my own
custom schema and want to setup this to my index. While executing the
StoreSchema command, was getting below error with some message bits.
com.basho.r
I'm experimenting with Riak and trying out with some of our use cases. Our
basic requirement is to have better response times with low latency and
hence moving away from costly joins in RDBMS.
While modelling, for some of the mappings I can model them as muitiple
key-value pairs or use combination
al but requests for objects may return
> not_found until read repair or AAE fixes the replicas.
> --
> Luke Bakken
> Engineer / CSE
> lbak...@basho.com
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Santi Kumar wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm new to the Riak. I know the
Hi,
I'm new to the Riak. I know the default value of n_val is 2, but is it
possible to start with one node, no replication initially and then start
adding the nodes and increase the replication factor.
What happens if I run only a single node without changing the default
values? Does it cause any
33 matches
Mail list logo
