Confirmed as working from my end.
On 8 August 2013 05:58, Hector Castro wrote:
> Hey Matt,
>
> That issue should be resolved now. Please ping us if you hit any further
> issues.
>
> --
> Hector
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Matt Black
> wrote:
> > Hey Basho peeps,
> >
> > Looks like yo
Would you expect a restore of this size to take this long?
My cluster is comprised of 6 nodes, bitcask, and ring size of 128.
Total of 1.2 million keys/objects in a single bucket.
I have some fairly large objects. A few, less than 10, are around if not
greater than 1GB. Less than 1000 are greate
Hey Matt,
That issue should be resolved now. Please ping us if you hit any further issues.
--
Hector
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Matt Black wrote:
> Hey Basho peeps,
>
> Looks like you might have signed the latest Riak release with new
> certificate (or something) - Apt is reporting that t
On Aug 7, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Jace Poirier-Pinto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to use Riak's gem 'ripple' for a Ruby on Rails project and I was
> wondering if there was any 'advanced' documentation for data manipulation in
> the Document Model. Specifically, setting up and using secondary ind
Hi Jace,
The rubydoc is probably the best resource to use. For instance, here's
more information on how to manipulate secondary indexes:
http://rubydoc.info/github/seancribbs/ripple/Ripple/Index
Let me know if that's not what you're looking for.
- Chris
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Jace
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:44 AM, rsb wrote:
> I have tried updating my project to use the new PB 1.4, however during
> runtime I get the following exception:
> ...
> Any ideas what is causing the issue, and how can I resolve it? - Thanks.
Yes; don't do that.
The 1.4.0 version of the riak-pb jar
I have tried updating my project to use the new PB 1.4, however during
runtime I get the following exception:
This occurs on the following line:
My project is using /com.basho.riak:riak-client:1.1.1/ retrieved using
maven. Within the library I replaced the class /riak-pb-1.2.jar/ for th
Ok, thank you! Looking forward to the next release.
On 6 August 2013 17:32, Evan Vigil-McClanahan wrote:
> 11 + 4 + 16, so 31.
>
> 18 bytes there are the actual data, so that can't go away. Since the
> allocation sized are going to be word aligned, the least overhead
> there is going to be word
As a 2nd thought, you could have a key per player on the player's bucket
and a key with the collection of units per player on the unit's bucket.
Guido.
On 07/08/13 15:52, Guido Medina wrote:
Whats the size of each unit JSON wise?, if it is too small, you could
have the player's units inside a
Responses inline.
---
Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar Unlimited
MCITP: SQL Server 2008, MVP
Cloudera Certified Developer for Apache Hadoop
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Maksymilian Strzelecki wrote:
> Hi. I've read somewhere around the Internet that Riak benefits its
> performence when
Whats the size of each unit JSON wise?, if it is too small, you could
have the player's units inside a single key as a collection, that way
when you fetch a player your key will contain the units and you could
play around with mutations/locking of such player's key. And also, it
will leverage y
Hi. I've read somewhere around the Internet that Riak benefits its
performence when there are more buckets and not massive amount of keys in
them. Now, if this is true I'm asking for an advice on how to go about my
data model.
I've started off with one bucket called accounts_units. Every player ha
Hello,
I am trying to use Riak's gem 'ripple' for a Ruby on Rails project and I
was wondering if there was any 'advanced' documentation for data
manipulation in the Document Model. Specifically, setting up and using
secondary indexes, accessing 'self' variables, etc.
__
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Shane McEwan wrote:
> It doesn't seem to be causing us any problems and @beerriot's comments on
> #49 seem to indicate the messages are safe to ignore so that's what I'll do
> until we're ready to upgrade.
Indeed, the problem is harmless, other than generating log
Hi. I saw before this warning with clusters with not enough nodes.
On this case, the environment is amazon ec2 c1.xlarge machines in the same
availability zone. 5 machines. Manage with chef and the oficial riak
cookbook 2.2.0 that installs riak 1.4.0 build 1.
The process:
knife ssh "roles:riak
Thanks Jared. I wonder why my searching didn't locate these issues on
GitHub? My Google-fu must be lacking. :-)
It doesn't seem to be causing us any problems and @beerriot's comments
on #49 seem to indicate the messages are safe to ignore so that's what
I'll do until we're ready to upgrade.
16 matches
Mail list logo
