BTW, I didn't see this actually covered in the wiki, but in my testing just
now, I found that instead of "source" you can pass "name" and specify an
existing JS function (of which Riak has several included to assist with map
& reduce phases). (Sadly, the provided JS functions have no code comments,
I've not attempted map/reduce before, so this was a learning experience for
me.
Pay attention to the brackets in the function :-)
root@dev:~# curl -i -d
'{"inputs":"test","query":[{"map":{"language":"javascript","source":"function(val)
{ return [val]; }","keep":true}}]}' -H "Content-Type: applicat
Any update on the possibility of getting an APT/PPA repository for Debian
users?
A ppa repo hosted on Launchpad would be keen :-)
I'm sure the RHEL guys would like a YUM repo as well.
Repository support is a must, as it can improve the chances of getting
non-Riak users to try it out (copy/pasting
Hi,
I'm trying to test out riak's mapreduce for just a simple case but I
can't get it to work. Maybe someone can help with what I'm doing
wrong. I have the latest build of Riak available for Ubuntu
installed.
I add an object to riak, that works. I can then fetch it. Then I try
to run a mapredu
Yep, our sysadmin admitted he's behind on upgrades, we'll get it upgraded
and see if that solves the problem. Thanks Mathias!
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Mathias Meyer wrote:
> Eric,
>
> are you by any chance still running Riak 0.14.1? There was a bug showing
> the same symptoms you're desc
Afternoon, Evening, Morning to All -
For today's Recap: jobs, new wiki content, Riak at a Cassandra meetup,
new code for the Python client, and much more.
Enjoy.
Mark
Community Manager
Basho Technologies
wiki.basho.com
twitter.com/pharkmillups
Riak Reca
Hello fellow Riakers,
What are the factors that affect how long it takes Riak to do a merge?
In our scenario, doing a merge takes about an hour per node, and that's
regardless of wether that's a result of Riak deciding to do a merge on it's
own, us forcing a merge (which we do nightly via cron)
Hi,
I'm looking at ways to improve riaksearch queries that produce a lot of
matches.
In my use case, I only ever want the top 20 results for any query, and
results should be ordered by date (which is encoded in the key). For
searches with few matches (numFound < ~1000), performance is great. For
Didn't have a close look, but it seems like a bug in riak-js. Please
open an issue at https://github.com/frank06/riak-js/issues
If you have any doubt, *always* prefer `db.get()` and `db.save()`. I
kinda regret having agreed to include `db.update()`. If it's causing
confusion I will have to remove
Claus,
it looks you're mixing up metadata objects with actual data objects when
calling update. update does a get/put cycle, where it fetches an object, merges
its attributes with the ones you hand over to update() and save the result
back. Any change you accidentally pass in the meta object fr
Greetings,
Thanks for the response. The recommendation on simply taking out the
corrupted buffer file worked! There was indeed single buffer file
(buffer.13), which apparently was causing the crash. Once renamed, the
node stopped hanging on new data inserts. Thanks for the
interpretation of the
11 matches
Mail list logo