Re: bitcask 42?

Dan, Thanks for the suggestions. Our startup script currently starts riak on each node, then goes back and joins each node to node 1, waiting until ringready is ok before advancing. Appropriate pauses added, and we had to reduce the gossip interval to 10 seconds to make it run quickly enough.

Re: SELinux Error

I have built riak on my machine, and did not copy the build from another machine. No nothing Else has changed in my machine. Its a fresh install of Fedora13 and i have not really meddled around with the SELinux settings. Sam """ Anyday... Above the ground and vertical ... is a good day! """ http:/

Help with modeling and gotchas

Hey all, I was wondering if someone could take a poke at the following issue I opened for myself on a side project: http://github.com/lusis/vogeler/issues/#issue/14 It's kind of terse but essentially, I wanted someone to vet and comment on the Riak portion. I'm essentially looking for recommenda

Re: Re: riak-erlang-client install error

Hi Dan, I installed Mercurial on my system. And set the environment. "setenv LANG C" It worked. Thanks. Tetsuya - Original Message - >Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:18:47 -0700 >Subject: Re: riak-erlang-client install error >From: Dan Reverri >To: Tetsuya >Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com

Re: bitcask 42?

What if your DB continues to grow beyond the original design size and you need to add a lot more nodes? On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 16:34 -0700, Dan Reverri wrote: > Yes, that is true. > > Daniel Reverri > Developer Advocate > Basho Technologies, Inc. > d...@basho.com > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:

Re: bitcask 42?

I just updated the wiki to make it clearer. https://wiki.basho.com/display/RIAK/Configuration+Files Thanks for the heads up, Alexander. Mark ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_list

Re: bitcask 42?

Yes, that is true. Daniel Reverri Developer Advocate Basho Technologies, Inc. d...@basho.com On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Alexander Sicular wrote: > Dan, > Is it true that "ring_creation_size" should only be altered at the > creation of a cluster? Once you already have physical nodes in a c

Re: bitcask 42?

Dan, Is it true that "ring_creation_size" should only be altered at the creation of a cluster? Once you already have physical nodes in a cluster you shouldn't adjust the "ring_creation_size". True? Thanks, Alexander. @siculars on twitter http://siculars.posterous.com Sent from my iPhone

Re: SELinux Error

I've never seen that error message. It looks like you've built Riak from source in "/livingcode/sandbox/riak/riak-0.12.0". Did you build Riak on that machine or copy the built release from another machine? Has anything else on the machine changed? Thanks, Dan Daniel Reverri Developer Advocate Bas

Re: bitcask 42?

Hi Michael, There is no hard coded limit to the number of nodes that can belong to a cluster. Depending on how quickly you are adding nodes to the cluster you may be running into an issue with the ring not converging on a single state. Can you try using the "riak-admin ringready" command between

Re: bitcask 42?

The default vnode number is 64. If you are connecting 63 physical nodes togeter in one riak cluster than you really want to increase the number of vnodes. There is some recommended metric for physical nodes to vnodes. I think it's like a minimum of 4 vnodes per physical node. But I could be

bitcask 42?

Hey guys, My team was trying to launch a 63 node Riak cluster yesterday, using version 0.13rc3 and the bitcask backend. All 63 nodes agreed that the ring consisted of nodes 1-42 only. Any ideas? Is there a hardcoded limit to the number of nodes allowed? _

Re: Is this a silly design?

tries: > /riak/user1/20100929 > /riak/user1/20100930 > /riak/user1/20101001 > /riak/user1/20101002 > /riak/user1/20101003 > /riak/user1/20101004 > To map/reduce over the first 3 days of October you can specify your > map/reduce inputs as: > {"inputs":[[&quo