Yes, that is true.

Daniel Reverri
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
d...@basho.com


On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Alexander Sicular <sicul...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Dan,
> Is it true that "ring_creation_size" should only be altered at the
> creation of a cluster? Once you already have physical nodes in a cluster you
> shouldn't adjust the "ring_creation_size". True?
>
> Thanks, Alexander.
>
>
> @siculars on twitter
> http://siculars.posterous.com
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 30, 2010, at 19:16, Dan Reverri <d...@basho.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> There is no hard coded limit to the number of nodes that can belong to a
> cluster. Depending on how quickly you are adding nodes to the cluster you
> may be running into an issue with the ring not converging on a single state.
>
> Can you try using the "riak-admin ringready" command between each join of a
> node? This command will return TRUE if the nodes all agree on a particular
> ring state. You should run this command until it returns TRUE after each
> join.
>
> Also, Alexander is correct; you should deploy your nodes with an increased
> value for the "ring_creation_size" parameter in app.config. The typical
> recommendation is to have a minimum of 10 partitions per node and the value
> should be a power of 2 (64, 128, 256, 512, 1024). For a 63 node cluster a
> value of 1024 would work well.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> Daniel Reverri
> Developer Advocate
> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> <d...@basho.com>d...@basho.com
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Alexander Sicular < <sicul...@gmail.com>
> sicul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The default vnode number is 64. If you are connecting 63 physical nodes
>> togeter in one riak cluster than you really want to increase the number of
>> vnodes. There is some recommended metric for physical nodes to vnodes. I
>> think it's like a minimum of 4 vnodes per physical node. But I could be
>> totally making that up.
>>
>> -Alexander.
>>
>>
>> @siculars on twitter
>> <http://siculars.posterous.com>http://siculars.posterous.com
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Sep 30, 2010, at 14:26, Michael Colussi < <mcolu...@gmail.com>
>> mcolu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> My team was trying to launch a 63 node Riak cluster yesterday, using
>> version 0.13rc3 and the bitcask backend.
>>
>> All 63 nodes agreed that the ring consisted of nodes 1-42 only.
>>
>> Any ideas?  Is there a hardcoded limit to the number of nodes allowed?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing list
>> <riak-users@lists.basho.com>riak-users@lists.basho.com
>>  <http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com>
>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing list
>>  <riak-users@lists.basho.com>riak-users@lists.basho.com
>>  <http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com>
>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>>
>>
>  _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to