What if your DB continues to grow beyond the original design size and
you need to add a lot more nodes?

On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 16:34 -0700, Dan Reverri wrote:
> Yes, that is true.
> 
> Daniel Reverri
> Developer Advocate
> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> d...@basho.com
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Alexander Sicular
> <sicul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>         Dan, 
>         Is it true that "ring_creation_size" should only be altered at
>         the creation of a cluster? Once you already have physical
>         nodes in a cluster you shouldn't adjust the
>         "ring_creation_size". True?
>         
>         
>         Thanks, Alexander.   
>         
>         
>         
>         @siculars on twitter
>         http://siculars.posterous.com
>         
>         
>         Sent from my iPhone
>         
>         
>         On Sep 30, 2010, at 19:16, Dan Reverri <d...@basho.com> wrote:
>         
>         
>         
>         > Hi Michael,
>         > 
>         > 
>         > There is no hard coded limit to the number of nodes that can
>         > belong to a cluster. Depending on how quickly you are adding
>         > nodes to the cluster you may be running into an issue with
>         > the ring not converging on a single state.
>         > 
>         > 
>         > Can you try using the "riak-admin ringready" command between
>         > each join of a node? This command will return TRUE if the
>         > nodes all agree on a particular ring state. You should run
>         > this command until it returns TRUE after each join.
>         > 
>         > 
>         > Also, Alexander is correct; you should deploy your nodes
>         > with an increased value for the "ring_creation_size"
>         > parameter in app.config. The typical recommendation is to
>         > have a minimum of 10 partitions per node and the value
>         > should be a power of 2 (64, 128, 256, 512, 1024). For a 63
>         > node cluster a value of 1024 would work well.
>         > 
>         > 
>         > Thanks,
>         > Dan
>         > 
>         > Daniel Reverri
>         > Developer Advocate
>         > Basho Technologies, Inc.
>         > d...@basho.com
>         > 
>         > 
>         > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Alexander Sicular
>         > <sicul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>         >         The default vnode number is 64. If you are
>         >         connecting 63 physical nodes togeter in one riak
>         >         cluster than you really want to increase the number
>         >         of vnodes. There is some recommended metric for
>         >         physical nodes to vnodes. I think it's like a
>         >         minimum of 4 vnodes per physical node. But I could
>         >         be totally making that up. 
>         >         
>         >         
>         >         -Alexander. 
>         >         
>         >         
>         >         
>         >         @siculars on twitter
>         >         http://siculars.posterous.com
>         >         
>         >         
>         >         Sent from my iPhone
>         >         
>         >         
>         >         On Sep 30, 2010, at 14:26, Michael Colussi
>         >         <mcolu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>         >         
>         >         
>         >         
>         >         > Hey guys,
>         >         > 
>         >         > 
>         >         > My team was trying to launch a 63 node Riak
>         >         > cluster yesterday, using version 0.13rc3 and the
>         >         > bitcask backend.
>         >         > 
>         >         > 
>         >         > All 63 nodes agreed that the ring consisted of
>         >         > nodes 1-42 only.
>         >         > 
>         >         > 
>         >         > Any ideas?  Is there a hardcoded limit to the
>         >         > number of nodes allowed?
>         >         > _______________________________________________
>         >         > riak-users mailing list
>         >         > riak-users@lists.basho.com
>         >         > 
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>         >         > 
>         >         
>         >         _______________________________________________
>         >         riak-users mailing list
>         >         riak-users@lists.basho.com
>         >         
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>         >         
>         > 
>         > 
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > riak-users mailing list
>         > riak-users@lists.basho.com
>         > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>         > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com



_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to