On 2021-03-06, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2021-02-08, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2021-01-06, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2020-12-07, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
The percentage of packages that are reproducible admittedly doesn't look
amazing, even though there has been steady prog
On 2021-02-08, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2021-01-06, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2020-12-07, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> The percentage of packages that are reproducible admittedly doesn't look
>>> amazing, even though there has been steady progress:
>>>
>>> stretch 93.8%
>>> buster
On 2021-01-06, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2020-12-07, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> I just wanted to spend a few moments looking over the progress
>> Reproducible Builds has made in Debian over the last few release cycles.
>
> We've had some good progress since last month!
And another ~month of s
On 2020-12-07, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I just wanted to spend a few moments looking over the progress
> Reproducible Builds has made in Debian over the last few release cycles.
We've had some good progress since last month!
> The percentage of packages that are reproducible admittedly doesn't
Hi Vagrant,
> I just wanted to spend a few moments looking over the progress
> Reproducible Builds has made in Debian over the last few release cycles.
[…]
> So, while Reproducible Builds in Debian is dealing with the challenges
> of a "last mile" problem (please forgive my use of an anachronistic
I just wanted to spend a few moments looking over the progress
Reproducible Builds has made in Debian over the last few release cycles.
The percentage of packages that are reproducible admittedly doesn't look
amazing, even though there has been steady progress:
stretch 93.8%
buster 94.1%
