On 2021-02-08, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2021-01-06, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> On 2020-12-07, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >>> The percentage of packages that are reproducible admittedly doesn't look >>> amazing, even though there has been steady progress: >>> >>> stretch 93.8% >>> buster 94.1% >>> bullseye 94.9% >>> unstable 83.7% >> >> bullseye 95.2% (+0.3%) >> unstable 84.2% (+0.5%) > > bullseye 95.5% (+0.3%) > unstable 84.7% (+0.5%)
bullseye 95.5% (+0.0%) unstable 84.9% (+0.2%) >>> Yet a look at the overall numbers of packages that are reproducible by >>> release: >>> >>> stretch 23204 >>> buster 26740 >>> bullseye 28560 >>> unstable 26456 >> >> bullseye 28929 (+369) >> unstable 26684 (+228) > > bullseye 29412 (+483) > unstable 27063 (+379) bullseye 29630 (+218) unstable 27162 (+99) Pretty modest improvement this month, but still progress. I'm a little confused in how the numbers/percentages work out (e.g. +99 packages in unstable shouldn't bump +0.2%) but ... this is just a rough measure after all. >>> For reference, I'm just looking at and visually comparing: >>> >>> >>> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/bullseye/index_suite_amd64_stats.html >>> >>> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/index_suite_amd64_stats.html live well, vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
