Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-03.txt

2017-04-26 Thread Andreas Huber
Hi Roger, thanks for version 0.17! This one should solve most of our "registrar" issues (Hopefully, some registries plan to implement this version soon). Some thoughts to open questions: * Premium Domain Availability without Fee-Ext. I would also vote to respond with "unavailable". The status

Re: [regext] REGEXT Fee Document

2017-11-16 Thread Andreas Huber
Hi all, should be under . I have the same points than Pat. We do not need to know if a price of a single command *COULD* be non-standard. Thats the same as completely skipping . Indeed, what I really need, is to know if a single fee is "standard" or "non-standard" priced, because we do a comp

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

2018-01-09 Thread Andreas Huber
Hi, I planned to attend, but unfortunately can't make it. Regarding 1.a, as mentioned before, it "would" be very helpful to know if a billable transaction (create, renew, transfer, restore) is priced with a standard fee (based on contracts between registrars and registries) or a non-standard f