Hi, I planned to attend, but unfortunately can't make it.
Regarding 1.a, as mentioned before, it "would" be very helpful to know if a billable transaction (create, renew, transfer, restore) is priced with a standard fee (based on contracts between registrars and registries) or a non-standard fee. There is no need to put this information inside <class>, any other tag or attribute would also work (proposed by JG). Probably the usage of <class> by some registries, to transport this information, as documented in draft version 05 and 06, leads us to this discussion. But well, if nobody else has this requirement, it's probably a "nice to have" and clients should make their decisions whether a fee is standard/non-standard in some other way - if a client needs it at all. Therefore, moving <class> to the object level is ok for me, if it's not used for this case. Best, Andreas Am 08.01.2018 um 17:11 schrieb Roger D Carney: > Good Morning, > > > > Thanks for email Antoin. We have had a few people indicate that they plan on > attending the meeting this Wednesday at 19:00UTC (Chris Cowherd, James Gould, > Jody Kolker, Scott Hollenbeck and of course the two chairs). > > > > As a reminder for the group, here is the agenda: > > 1. Fee > > a. Discuss appropriate level for <class>, at the object level <cd> or > <command> level > > b. Discuss WG Last Call > > 2. Registry Mappings > > a. Introduce the Registry Mapping concepts > > > > For agenda 1.a we will be making the decision on how <class> works (command > or object level), so for those that have an opinion on this topic, this will > be the last time to discuss before the document is updated. > > > > > > Thanks > > Roger > > > > > > *From:*Antoin Verschuren [mailto:i...@antoin.nl] > *Sent:* Monday, January 08, 2018 9:04 AM > *To:* Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com> > *Cc:* regext@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite > > > > I will attend too. > > But so far the chairs seem to be the only attendants? > > Are there any more people that will attend? > > > > I was waiting for some more respondents before scheduling the meeting. > > I just submitted the official meeting request, but that would be a late > notice for the secretariat. > > > > Roger, did you get any feedback on attendance? > > > > Regards, > > > > - -- > Antoin Verschuren > > Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL > M: +31 6 37682392 > > > > > > > > > > Op 13 dec. 2017, om 14:46 heeft James Galvin <gal...@elistx.com > <mailto:gal...@elistx.com>> het volgende geschreven: > > > > I will attend. > > Jim > > > > On 7 Dec 2017, at 11:36, Roger D Carney wrote: > > Good Morning, > > > > I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday > January 10^th at 19:00 UTC for 60 minutes. > > > > We plan to discuss items around the latest version of the Fee draft > and to introduce a Registry Mapping proposal. > > > > Agenda > > 1. Fee > > 1. Discuss appropriate level for <class>, at the object level > <cd> or <command> level > 2. Discuss WG Last Call > > 2. Registry Mappings > > 1. Introduce the Registry Mapping concepts > > > > We will once again use Zoom as a conferencing tool, please use this > link <https://godaddy.zoom.us/j/446675624> to connect to the meeting. > > > > Please reply to the list or directly to myself if you plan on > attending this meeting. > > > > > > Thanks > > Roger > > > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
