Moin,
There has been work recently in DNSOP on Generalised DNS Notifications (
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-02.html
).
This draft is mostly targeted at CDS/CDNSKEY, but is general to
other notifications.
As the draft currently stands this requires a record a
> On 30 Jul 2024, at 08:13, Q Misell wrote:
>
> Moin,
>
> There has been work recently in DNSOP on Generalised DNS Notifications
> (https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-02.html
> [ietf.org]).
> This draft is mostly targeted at CDS/CDNSKEY, but is general to oth
> You would only need an EPP extension in the scenario where different
domains under the sponsorship of the same registrar would need different
DSYNC information.
This would very much be the case with resellers, or even a registrar using
one ICANN accreditation for multiple somewhat operationally
Correct, the resellers would want to use it this way and likely they are
not reflected in the data model of a registry.
DENIC is using such approach for General Contact/Abuse Contact where
either registrar default setting applies or a specific one can be
assigned for the domain through the pro
There are a couple EPP Extension RFCs that may be of use with the Organization
Mapping in RFC 8543 and Organization Extension in RFC 8544 that do support the
definition and linkage of multiple organization types to registry objects, such
as Resellers and DNS Providers. The Organization Mapping
It appears that Q Misell said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>> You would only need an EPP extension in the scenario where different
>domains under the sponsorship of the same registrar would need different
>DSYNC information.
>
>This would very much be the case with resellers, or even a registrar using
>one IC
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-06.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) WG of the IETF.
Title: An RDAP Extension for Geofeed Data
Authors: Jasdip Singh
Tom Harrison
Name:draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-06.
Hi.
This version addresses the WGLC feedback from Mario, Andy, and James. Please
review.
Thanks,
Jasdip
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2024 at 2:42 PM
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Cc: regext@ietf.org
Subject: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-06.txt
Int
Hi Martin Thomson, Tim Bray,
As the designated expert for the XML ns and schema registries, can you review
the proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-15 for us? Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl/
The due date is August 13th.
If this is OK, when
Dear Scott Hollenbeck (cc: regext WG),
As the designated expert for the Extensions for the Extensible Provisioning
Protocol (EPP) registry, can you review the proposed registration in
draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-15 for us? Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl/
T
This looks fine to me. In section 2.1.1.2, should the 2nd example have “S”
in the left column?
On Jul 30, 2024 at 3:03:22 PM, David Dong via RT <
drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org> wrote:
> Hi Martin Thomson, Tim Bray,
>
> As the designated expert for the XML ns and schema registries, can you
11 matches
Mail list logo
