Hello Roger,
On 25/04/2017 23:40, Roger D Carney wrote:
> One topic that was discussed in Chicago (and not resolved) was on the
> concept of “premium names” and what is returned from the server if no fee
> extension was passed into the . Many thought to be more “backwards
> compatible”/”user frie
On 18 Apr 2017, at 8:46, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
-Original Message-
From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:34 AM
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] I-D Action:
draft-hollenbeck-regex
> -Original Message-
> From: James Galvin [mailto:gal...@elistx.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:39 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-
> object-tag-03.txt
>
>
>
> On 18 Apr 2017, at 8:46, Hol
Hi Roger,
thanks for version 0.17! This one should solve most of our "registrar" issues
(Hopefully, some registries plan to implement this version soon).
Some thoughts to open questions:
* Premium Domain Availability without Fee-Ext.
I would also vote to respond with "unavailable".
The status
At the last IETF meeting, it was agreed in the REGEXT meeting that the
following document is ready for submission to the IESG to be considered
for publication as a Proposed Standard:
Launch Phase Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-
Changed milestone "Submit for publication draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap",
added draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap to milestone.
Changed milestone "Submit for publication "CIRA IDN EPP Extension"",
added draft-cira-regext-idn to milestone, removed
draft-wilcox-cira-idn-eppext from milestone.
URL: https://datatr
