On 21 September 2017 at 22:11, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On 12 September 2017 at 10:22, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
>> On 3 April 2017 at 19:56, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> wrote:
>>> On 3 April 2017 16:21:55 CEST, Andrew Newton wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Bernhard
On 12 September 2017 at 10:22, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On 3 April 2017 at 19:56, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
>> On 3 April 2017 16:21:55 CEST, Andrew Newton wrote:
>>>On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>>> wrote:
On 22 March 2017 at 13:58, Bernhard Reu
On 23 March 2017 at 19:38, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On 23 March 2017 16:38:31 CET, Andrew Newton wrote:
>>On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> wrote:
> 2) entity handles
>
> At least for DNRs the mixture of registrars and contacts seems to
>>be
a
>
On 3 April 2017 at 19:56, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On 3 April 2017 16:21:55 CEST, Andrew Newton wrote:
>>On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> wrote:
>>> On 22 March 2017 at 13:58, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>>> 4) Domain object, secureDNS/delegationSigned
>>>
>>> --
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On 3 April 2017 20:44:34 CEST, Andrew Newton wrote:
>>On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> wrote:
>>> PS: can you please answer the other question too?
>>
>>Can you restate your questions? I'm unsure what is
On 3 April 2017 20:44:34 CEST, Andrew Newton wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
>> PS: can you please answer the other question too?
>
>Can you restate your questions? I'm unsure what is being asked.
Shouldn't there be a reference to the IANA Jason value r
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> PS: can you please answer the other question too?
Can you restate your questions? I'm unsure what is being asked.
-andy
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mai
On 3 April 2017 16:21:55 CEST, Andrew Newton wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
>> On 22 March 2017 at 13:58, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> 4) Domain object, secureDNS/delegationSigned
>>
>> ---8<---
>> * delegationSigned -- boolean true if there are DS
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On 22 March 2017 at 13:58, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> 4) Domain object, secureDNS/delegationSigned
>
> ---8<---
> * delegationSigned -- boolean true if there are DS records in the
> parent, false otherwise.
> ---8<-
On 22 March 2017 at 13:58, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 3) missing normative reference to IANA, "RDAP JSON Values" ?
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7483#section-10.2.2
> mentions
> ---8<---
> ... have been registered in the "RDAP JSON Values"
>registry:
> ---8<---
>
> But ther
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Newton [mailto:a...@hxr.us]
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 11:19 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: rep.dot@gmail.com; a...@arin.net; regext@ietf.org;
> gustavo.loz...@icann.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] RDAP question
> -Original Message-
> From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Newton
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 11:39 AM
> To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> Cc: Andy Newton ; regext@ietf.org; Gustavo Lozano
>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] RDAP ques
On 23 March 2017 16:38:31 CET, Andrew Newton wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
2) entity handles
At least for DNRs the mixture of registrars and contacts seems to
>be
>>>a
bit unfortunate at first glance.
For handles (in the DNR / R
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
>>> 2) entity handles
>>>
>>> At least for DNRs the mixture of registrars and contacts seems to be
>>a
>>> bit unfortunate at first glance.
>>> For handles (in the DNR / RFC5733 sense) could conflict between
>>> registrars and contac
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott
wrote:
>
> Someone should report this new erratum. Andy, do you want to take it, or
> should I?
>
> Scott
Scott,
I wouldn't want to rob you of the thrill one gets when filing errata. :)
-andy
___
re
Hi!
3) missing normative reference to IANA, "RDAP JSON Values" ?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7483#section-10.2.2
mentions
---8<---
... have been registered in the "RDAP JSON Values"
registry:
---8<---
But there is no reference (rendered?) to rdap-json-values in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/
On 21 March 2017 18:47:34 CET, Andrew Newton wrote:
>Hi...
>
>On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Another question
>>
>> 1) country (full name / name) versus country codes.
>>
>> In https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7483#section-3 you suggest to use
> -Original Message-
> From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Newton
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 1:48 PM
> To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> Cc: Andy Newton ; regext@ietf.org; Gustavo Lozano
>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] RDAP quest
Hi...
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Another question
>
> 1) country (full name / name) versus country codes.
>
> In https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7483#section-3 you suggest to use
> alpha-2 country codes
>
> Yet autnum and network talk about
>
Hi there,
Another question
1) country (full name / name) versus country codes.
In https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7483#section-3 you suggest to use
alpha-2 country codes
Yet autnum and network talk about
---8<---
o country -- a string containing the name of the two-character
country code
Brian, Andy,
Comments inline.
Regards,
Gustavo
From: regext on behalf of Andy Newton
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 11:09
To: Brian Mountford
Cc: "regext@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [regext] RDAP questions
>
>
>> On Aug 3, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Brian Mountford
On Aug 3, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Brian Mountford
mailto:mountf...@google.com>> wrote:
I have a couple questions about RDAP RFC 7483.
RFC 7483 4.7. Port 43 WHOIS Server
For registries such as ourselves, is this supposed to be the registrar’s
server, or ours? I would have thought the registrar’s sin
22 matches
Mail list logo
