Brian, Andy,

Comments inline.

Regards,
Gustavo

From:  regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Andy Newton
<a...@arin.net>
Date:  Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 11:09
To:  Brian Mountford <mountf...@google.com>
Cc:  "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Subject:  Re: [regext] RDAP questions

> 
> 
>> On Aug 3, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Brian Mountford <mountf...@google.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I have a couple questions about RDAP RFC 7483.
>> RFC 7483 4.7. Port 43 WHOIS Server
>> For registries such as ourselves, is this supposed to be the registrar¹s
>> server, or ours? I would have thought the registrar¹s since WHOIS AWIP is
>> that way. But the registrar¹s WHOIS is a URL, whereas this is explicitly not
>> so.
> 
> 
> Somebody else will have to answer as to which whois server this is suppose to
> reference (I think registrar). But there is no whois URI scheme, which is why
> that is explicitly not a URI.

In the case of the RDAP profile (gTLD space), the ³port43² element is not
expected to be used, because Whois/43 tcp will be deprecated in the future.
The objective of the RDAP profile is to keep everything in RDAP, and in the
case of ³thin² registrations, the RDAP URI of the RDAP service of the
Registrar is provided to the end-user as described in 2.3 of the RDAP
profile 
(https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rdap-operational-profile-2016-07-26-e
n).

> 
>> RFC 7483 5.1. The Entity Object Class
>> The RFC indicates that among the items of information we should return for an
>> entity is its role (admin, tech, billing, registrar, etc.). But contacts
>> don¹t necessarily have a single role. The same contact could have more than
>> one role in more than one domain. In our database, the role tag is associated
>> with the mapping of the domain to the contact, not with the contact itself.
>> So it¹s not clear how we can provide this information for contacts found
>> using a direct search. For contacts displayed as part of a domain search, or
>> for registrars, it¹s not a problem.
> 
> You have it exactly correct. If somebody were to lookup a contact directly,
> there is no context in which to have a role and therefore the ³roles² array
> should not be present.
> 
> -andy
> 


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to