Martin,
Yes, there are Production systems in place that use this namespace. Scoping
the namespace at this stage would cause Production interoperability issues.
Let me know if you need any additional information.
Thanks,
Jim
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 5, 2018, at 8:54 AM, Martin Thomson
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 6:49 PM Gould, James wrote:
> The scoping of the namespace for changepoll does have a negative impact,
Hi James,
Can you substantiate this claim? Understand that I am not familiar
with the work here.
___
regext mailing list
reg
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018, at 13:59, Jiankang Yao wrote:
>Your suggestion is very good. RFC7997 is an informational RFC, and
> shows a direction.
Not just a direction but possible things right now.
Because other formats than text are possible now, like PDF.
>Because the popular form of R
FYI, folks!
Scott
From: regi...@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Nicoleta
Munteanu
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018 6:41 PM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regiops] ROW#8 - May 9th, 2019 - Bangkok, Thailand
8th Registration Operations Workshop (ROW#8) | May 9th, 2019 | Bangkok, Thailand
The ROW Pr
Good Morning,
A small updated was needed, implementers found the "standard" attribute was not
at the correct level in the commandDataType.
Thanks
Roger
-Original Message-
From: regext On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2018 9:31 AM
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.o
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the
IETF.
Title : Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible
Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
Authors : Roger Car
Hellow Patrick Mevzek,
Thanks.
Your suggestion is very good. RFC7997 is an informational RFC, and shows a
direction.
Because the popular form of RFC is TXT, the TXT can not display non ASCII
very well.
I can use the natvie unicode characters in draft, but many readers will not
d
Martin,
I was involved with the namespace feedback with the launch phase extension.
The agreement was to scope the namespaces for new extensions going forward if
there was not a negative impact. The org, orgext, and fee extensions that are
going through the IESG now can support the scoping wi
