Martin, I was involved with the namespace feedback with the launch phase extension. The agreement was to scope the namespaces for new extensions going forward if there was not a negative impact. The org, orgext, and fee extensions that are going through the IESG now can support the scoping without impact, and have been scoped. The scoping of the namespace for changepoll does have a negative impact, so I am requesting to move forward with the urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0 namespace.
Thanks, Jim Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 4, 2018, at 1:39 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Folks, > > I'm seeing an increase in EPP registrations for the XML namespace and > schema registries. > > In the past, the names this group have selected are quite generic. > > I would like to request that this group include a label in the names > that it uses. Other users of these registries carefully scope the > names they use to avoid conflict, but this group has not done that. > > I realize that there is an established pattern here that would need to > change, which is a little disruptive, but I think that it would be > respectful to other users of the registry to start using scoped names > for new registrations. > > That is, in the most recent document I've been asked to review: > > urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0 > > becomes > > urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:changePoll-1.0 > > And future documents follow the same pattern. This is consistent with > other uses of this registry. > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
