Hellow Patrick Mevzek, Thanks.
Your suggestion is very good. RFC7997 is an informational RFC, and shows a direction. Because the popular form of RFC is TXT, the TXT can not display non ASCII very well. I can use the natvie unicode characters in draft, but many readers will not display it correctly. According to my current understanding, U+XXXX is still the proper way to be easily understood by most readers. Many years ago, IETF EAI WG also discussed this related issue. I still do not see which rfc uses the natvie unicode characters directly. If possilbe, I may suggest to add some texts in the draft, which says "in future, the natvie unicode characters instead of U+XXXX notation are suggested to use in the document" Best Regards Jiankang Yao > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: "Patrick Mevzek" <p...@dotandco.com> > 发送时间: 2018-11-02 12:54:37 (星期五) > 收件人: regext@ietf.org > 抄送: > 主题: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration and characters > representation > > Hello, > > This draft, by essence, needs and uses a lot of characters outside of ASCII > and for these use the U+XXXX notation. > > There is now however RFC7997 (The Use of Non-ASCII Characters in RFCs) and > among other things it says: > > - the encoding of future RFCs will be in UTF-8 > - Where the use of non-ASCII characters is purely part of an example > and not otherwise required for correct protocol operation, escaping > the non-ASCII character is not required. > - The RFC Editor encourages the use of the U+ notation except within a > code component where one must follow the rules of the programming > language in which the code is being written. > > > So maybe the XML examples could be rewritten by using the native unicode > characters > instead of the U+ notation, as I believe it would make them far more > understandable. > > In the text, the other recommendations of the above RFC could be applied to > have > more standardized handling. > > -- > Patrick Mevzek > p...@dotandco.com > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
