Changed milestone "Submit for publication draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap",
added draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap to milestone.
Changed milestone "Submit for publication "CIRA IDN EPP Extension"",
added draft-cira-regext-idn to milestone, removed
draft-wilcox-cira-idn-eppext from milestone.
URL: https://datatr
At the last IETF meeting, it was agreed in the REGEXT meeting that the
following document is ready for submission to the IESG to be considered
for publication as a Proposed Standard:
Launch Phase Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-
Hi Roger,
thanks for version 0.17! This one should solve most of our "registrar" issues
(Hopefully, some registries plan to implement this version soon).
Some thoughts to open questions:
* Premium Domain Availability without Fee-Ext.
I would also vote to respond with "unavailable".
The status
> -Original Message-
> From: James Galvin [mailto:gal...@elistx.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:39 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-
> object-tag-03.txt
>
>
>
> On 18 Apr 2017, at 8:46, Hol
On 18 Apr 2017, at 8:46, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
-Original Message-
From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:34 AM
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] I-D Action:
draft-hollenbeck-regex
Hello Roger,
On 25/04/2017 23:40, Roger D Carney wrote:
> One topic that was discussed in Chicago (and not resolved) was on the
> concept of “premium names” and what is returned from the server if no fee
> extension was passed into the . Many thought to be more “backwards
> compatible”/”user frie