> JF Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > That was wmconfig job: ensure menus were up to date.
>
> Well, they never really were. Not much supported that method of WM
> config and whenever you installed a new app, it wasn't in the list.
>
> How many real fans of AnotherLevel are out there
> > > In fact people with 16 Megs boxes will be unahappy. Even with 32 megs
> > > Gnome/kde are not so great when yoyu are using 6.2 beta.
> >
> > My daughter's using gnome on RHL 6.0 on a P133, 32 Mb and that's not
> > flash. Esp when she starts SO.
>
> If you use a sensible configuration t
> On a 486 _S_X? The scalable fonts must have been painful for a CPU
> without math coprocessor. It took over 1 minute in a 386DX 40 to
> parse them when X started.
You turn them off. Definitely. I also built a custom window mangler for it
Alan
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL
>
> > > In fact people with 16 Megs boxes will be unahappy. Even with 32 megs
> > > Gnome/kde are not so great when yoyu are using 6.2 beta.
> >
> > My daughter's using gnome on RHL 6.0 on a P133, 32 Mb and that's not
> > flash. Esp when she starts SO.
>
> If you use a sensible configuratio
JF Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That was wmconfig job: ensure menus were up to date.
Well, they never really were. Not much supported that method of WM
config and whenever you installed a new app, it wasn't in the list.
How many real fans of AnotherLevel are out there? I know I neve
> > In fact people with 16 Megs boxes will be unahappy. Even with 32 megs
> > Gnome/kde are not so great when yoyu are using 6.2 beta.
>
> My daughter's using gnome on RHL 6.0 on a P133, 32 Mb and that's not
> flash. Esp when she starts SO.
If you use a sensible configuration then both gnome
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > > The following packages and features are DEPRECATED, and may not
> > > be supported or included in future Red Hat Linux releases:
> > > - AnotherLevel
> >
> > Hmm, I guess fvwm2 users won't be quite happy with this...
> >
>
> In fac
>
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > The following packages and features are DEPRECATED, and may not
> > be supported or included in future Red Hat Linux releases:
> > - AnotherLevel
>
> Hmm, I guess fvwm2 users won't be quite happy with this...
>
In fact people with 16 Megs
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> The following packages and features are DEPRECATED, and may not
> be supported or included in future Red Hat Linux releases:
> - AnotherLevel
Hmm, I guess fvwm2 users won't be quite happy with this...
> - wmconfig
Has AfterStep learned to set up it
> On Wed Feb 09 2000 at 23:47, George Karabin wrote:
>
> > > Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and
> > > pre-releases) of a new distribution. In fact, two CHANGES files...
>
> Nice to see a reply so quickly. I hope this issue gets a fair bit of
> debate (as this threa
> It can be a difficult and onerous task to rebuild lots of server and
> client boxes up to a new distro version, or to try to integrate these
> into existing infrastructures and configurations when some features
> have changed (sometimes radically). To have some decent documentation
> available
> Tony Nugent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and
> > pre-releases) of a new distribution. In fact, two CHANGES files...
>
> There will be something along these lines with 6.2 final. I'm
> not sure it will necessarily go into all the det
Bill, thanks for the post. I think that the document is definetely a
step in the right direction.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 10:44:20AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> - The various BSD-based network services (telnet, finger, talk,
> rsh, ruers, rwall, tftp) have been split into client and
> s
Thanks for the reply Bill, it's really nice to know that you guys/gals
are quietly listening here...
On Thu Feb 10 2000 at 10:44, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Tony Nugent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and
> > pre-releases) of a new distribu
Tony Nugent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and
> pre-releases) of a new distribution. In fact, two CHANGES files...
There will be something along these lines with 6.2 final. I'm
not sure it will necessarily go into all the detail you need
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 04:54:50PM +1000, Tony Nugent wrote:
> - one to describe the overall changes (eg, the installer, new
> or replaced/deleted packages, new features, default desktop
> changes, overall stuff like that).
The "WhatsNew" section of the Install Guide has muc
At 18:26 2/10/00 +1000, Tony Nugent wrote:
>Nice to see a reply so quickly. I hope this issue gets a fair bit of
>debate (as this thread died in a pathetic whimper in the lead-up to
>rh61, and IIRC, rh60 before that).
if memory serves the last time it was an entirely one sided plea from
the user
On Wed Feb 09 2000 at 23:47, George Karabin wrote:
> > Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and
> > pre-releases) of a new distribution. In fact, two CHANGES files...
Nice to see a reply so quickly. I hope this issue gets a fair bit of
debate (as this thread died in a pa
This ought to make interpreting the output a little easier by tagging each
changelog with the package name, version, and release:
'rpm -q --queryformat
"\n%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}\n###
Oops. The syntax ought to be 'rpm -q --changelog -p '. I
should have checked it before I sent it!
George Karabin wrote:
> RPM provides a hook that might give you some of what you want. 'rpm
> --changelog -p will dump the changes associated with a list of
> packages. You can use 'diff' to compar
RPM provides a hook that might give you some of what you want. 'rpm
--changelog -p will dump the changes associated with a list of
packages. You can use 'diff' to compare the changes from an old release
to a new release to see what's changed.
I see two gotchas to this approach, depending on the
I've just read on slashdot that the redhat 6.2 beta has been made
available (although I haven't check for it myself). I've asked about
this before, and now would be a good time to bring this issue up
again...
Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and
pre-releases) of a new
22 matches
Mail list logo
