Re: No Attachments Please! (was: Re: rpm version list)

2000-05-22 Thread JF Martinez
> > > Given the recent spate of e-mail viruses involving > > attachments, could everyone =please= not send any > > of them? > > Attachments are often a sound, simple way of adding information. > > Configure yourself safely. > Attachments are right. Now the problem is that some readers interp

Re: No Attachments Please! (was: Re: rpm version list)

2000-05-22 Thread John Summerfield
> Any one know of a good way to foster a local user group? Ins't there a HOWTO on the topic? > < -- Cheers John Summerfield http://os2.ami.com.au/os2/ for OS/2 support. Configuration, networking, combined IBM ftpsites index. -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/n

Re: No Attachments Please! (was: Re: rpm version list)

2000-05-22 Thread John Summerfield
> Given the recent spate of e-mail viruses involving > attachments, could everyone =please= not send any > of them? Attachments are often a sound, simple way of adding information. Configure yourself safely. testemailvulnerability.sh Cheers John Summerfield http://os2.ami.com.au/os2/ for OS

Re: No Attachments Please! (was: Re: rpm version list)

2000-05-21 Thread Ralph E. Wasmer Jr.
>"Julie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Given the recent spate of e-mail viruses involving attachments, >> could everyone =please= not send any of them? > Just do not use MS products... Eudora? or something else. The problem is that the MS products are done s badly. That is why we have so

Re: No Attachments Please! (was: Re: rpm version list)

2000-05-21 Thread Brian Clifton
Not using MS LookOut stops the vast majority of headline viruses in their tracks. html format is a pain anyhow. I can not believe someone who has the good sense to be using linux is also using LookOut!! Brian > "Julie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Given the recent spate of e-mail viruses

Re: No Attachments Please! (was: Re: rpm version list)

2000-05-21 Thread Alan Shutko
"Julie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Given the recent spate of e-mail viruses involving attachments, > could everyone =please= not send any of them? If you turn off automatic execution of things in Outlook and don't click on attachments, you are safe. (Well, maybe not from javascript in HTML p

Re: No Attachments Please! (was: Re: rpm version list)

2000-05-21 Thread Greg Wright
*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 21/05/00 at 0:43 Julie wrote: >Given the recent spate of e-mail viruses involving >attachments, could everyone =please= not send any >of them? > >-- Julie. It makes no difference really, just do not execute any attachments, attachments in the form

No Attachments Please! (was: Re: rpm version list)

2000-05-21 Thread Julie
Given the recent spate of e-mail viruses involving attachments, could everyone =please= not send any of them? -- Julie. -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

Re: rpm version list

2000-05-21 Thread Tony Nugent
On Fri May 19 2000 at 09:27, Scott Mewett wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to install rawhide and having problems when it tries to > start installing the RPMS. > > Where does the official list of RPMS for the installer come from. > > I know there is the file base/comps but where does the installer

Re: rpm version list

2000-05-20 Thread jvanzyl
Scott Mewett wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to install rawhide and having problems when it tries to > start installing the RPMS. > > Where does the official list of RPMS for the installer come from. /RedHat/base/hdlist which is generated by running /misc/src/anaconda/utils/genhdlist genhdlist

Re: rpm version list

2000-05-20 Thread Jeremy Katz
On Friday, May 19 2000, Scott Mewett may have said: > I am trying to install rawhide and having problems when it tries to > start installing the RPMS. > > Where does the official list of RPMS for the installer come from. > > I know there is the file base/comps but where does the installer get >