Hello,
> I personally use 1600x1200 and make the fonts readable
> for each app where necessary!
Actually that's why 75dpi and 100dpi versions of the fonts
exist. This is normally enough - although there are cases
where 1600x1200 on a 17" (i.e. 125 dpi or so) comes handy,
it normally does not mak
JF Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Supporting a resolution is one thing, getting a good refresh rate is
> another and having adequate size still another. For instance my
> display supports 1280x1024 but at this resolution refresh rate is only
> 60Hz while ophtalmologists say anything unde
>
> viri- wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering what resolution that everyone seems to like? I am
> > having trouble deciding on what is best. Some are just to big and some are
> > just so small it's hard to read everything. Thanks,
>
> I can't speak for others, but I think most use at least 10
On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Ivan Jager sent up smoke signals saying:
IJ>viri- wrote:
IJ>>
IJ>> I was wondering what resolution that everyone seems to like? I am
IJ>> having trouble deciding on what is best. Some are just to big and some are
IJ>> just so small it's hard to read everything. Thanks,
viri- wrote:
>
> I was wondering what resolution that everyone seems to like? I am
> having trouble deciding on what is best. Some are just to big and some are
> just so small it's hard to read everything. Thanks,
I can't speak for others, but I think most use at least 1024x768. If you
lo
