[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> gcc 2.95 C++ libraries are not compatible with those of egcs.You
> have to keep both sets. But then there the libraieds who use those
> C++ libraries so you also tow keep two sets of Qt, kdelib and every
> C++ library in the distrib.
To be sure I installed al
On Thu, 08 Feb 2001 03:14:32 +0800, John Summerfield said:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > The rule is that we break binary compatibility (e.g. major updates to
> > gcc or glibc or other system libraries) only for major releases.
>
> > That's why 6.2 still had egcs 1.1.2.
>
> I've be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> The rule is that we break binary compatibility (e.g. major updates to
> gcc or glibc or other system libraries) only for major releases.
> That's why 6.2 still had egcs 1.1.2.
I've been running gcc 2.95 on RHL 6.x (and 5.0) for quite some time.
Broke nothing so far
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > It's binary incompatible with 0.9.5(a).
>
> Pardon me?... That means that Red Hat version 12.3 :-) will still use
> openssl-0.9.5 because openssl-2.4.11 :-) will be binary incompatible with
> 0.9.5?
No, it means that 0.9.5 will stay until the
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Why the beta version of Red Hat is still using openssl-0-9.5
> > when 0.9.6 is already available?
>
> Because 0.9.6 is not binary compatible with 0.9.5x and we don't break
> binary compatibility in minor r
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Why the beta version of Red Hat is still using openssl-0-9.5 when 0.9.6 is
> > already available?
>
> It's binary incompatible with 0.9.5(a).
Pardon me?... That means that Red Hat version 12.3 :-) will stil
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why the beta version of Red Hat is still using openssl-0-9.5
> when 0.9.6 is already available?
Because 0.9.6 is not binary compatible with 0.9.5x and we don't break
binary compatibility in minor releases if it can be avoided.
LLaP
bero
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Why the beta version of Red Hat is still using openssl-0-9.5 when 0.9.6 is
> already available?
It's binary incompatible with 0.9.5(a).
Bill
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
