On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 04:21:19PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "PS" == Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> PS> I haven't done this myself, but wrapping up some magic that'd fetch all
> PS> the headers and check for Obsoletes: field might work.
>
> Is that the method that
> "PS" == Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PS> I haven't done this myself, but wrapping up some magic that'd fetch all
PS> the headers and check for Obsoletes: field might work.
Is that the method that the upgrader uses? It seems that would handle a
rename but might not handle a pac
On 17 Jan 2001, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "BR" == Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> BR> kernel-utils is obsolete, use the new ksymoops package.
>
> I'm curious: is there some way to cope with packages changing names or
> splitting other than doing it by hand? Obviou
> "BR" == Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BR> kernel-utils is obsolete, use the new ksymoops package.
I'm curious: is there some way to cope with packages changing names or
splitting other than doing it by hand? Obviously the updater knows how to
do it, but I don't know h
_
Ê׶¼ÔÚÏß--ÖйúÈ˵ÄÍøÉϼÒÔ° http://www.263.net
@263.netÖйú×î´óµÄÔÚÏßÓÊ¾Ö http://freemail.263.net
ÖйúÈ˵ÄÔÚÏß¹ºÎïÀÖÔ°¡ª¡ª263ÉÌ³Ç http://shopping.263.net
ÍøÉÏÁôѧ×Éѯ-Öйú½ÌÓý·þÎñÍø http://edu.263.net/
_
Alan Shutko wrote:
>
> Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Way too many use "everything" - anyway, it's a policy not to have such
> > > conflicts in the main. Everything can be installed at once, if you
> > > really want to.
> >
> > hmm I don't think so. may be way too many use "d
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Levente Farkas wrote:
> > > what I'd like to see, that if I already have an installed mta (not
> > > all just "suppoted") than the next distro's updater do _not_ install
> > > sendmail which overwrites eg /usr/sbin/sendmail.
> >
> > Does this(sendmail upgrades postfix) happen
Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Way too many use "everything" - anyway, it's a policy not to have such
> > conflicts in the main. Everything can be installed at once, if you
> > really want to.
>
> hmm I don't think so. may be way too many use "default". if it's true
> it's high t
On 17 Jan 2001, Anand Palaniswamy wrote:
> > > which RPMs must go into disc1 and which should go into disc2?
> >
> > It only matters for how often it will ask you to swap CDs. Other than
> > that, which RPM goes where isn't particularly relevant.
>
> Thanks. Your answer, however, begs a followu
>
> Thanks. Your answer, however, begs a followup question: "What
> allotment should I choose to minimize swapping CDs?"
>
i suggest you to see what RPMS are in disc2 of 7.0 and do a similiar iso
image.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PRO
> From: Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Anand Palaniswamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
>
> > which RPMs must go into disc1 and which should go into disc2?
>
> It only matters for how often it will ask you to swap CDs. Other than
> that, which RPM goes where isn't particularly relevant.
> > when it is requested by many (ok what does it mean "many") people that
> > put it into (at least) preview.
>
> I don't think we'll disable it unless some really good reason shows
> up...
disable what ?
> > > They conflict, which isn't acceptable for the core components. Thus,
> > > postfix
Anand Palaniswamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> I want to burn 2 CD's with rawhide rpms. I found
>
> ftp://rawhide.redhat.com/pub/rawhide/i386/README
>
> but this document (because its intent is to explain CD->filesystem and
> not vice versa) doesn't answer one question I have -- which R
Hello...
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Karen Shaeffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 07:08:15AM -0800, Christopher McCrory wrote:
>>
It will be included when/if it matures
>>>
LLaP
bero
>>>
>>> We are discussing putting reiser in the ra
Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> >
> > Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > but (as always) I prefer freedom and the chance for choice. that's what
> > > I realy request from rh (and waiting for it). if there is more jurnaling fs
> > >
Karen Shaeffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 07:08:15AM -0800, Christopher McCrory wrote:
> > >
> > > It will be included when/if it matures
> >
> > >
> > > LLaP
> > > bero
> > >
> >
> > We are discussing putting reiser in the rawhide tree yes? It's a
> > develo
could linuxconf be removed from the base installation?
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 07:08:15AM -0800, Christopher McCrory wrote:
> >
> > It will be included when/if it matures
>
> >
> > LLaP
> > bero
> >
>
> We are discussing putting reiser in the rawhide tree yes? It's a
> development tree, yes? Why not put in reiserfs, ext3, xfs , and jfs
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > but (as always) I prefer freedom and the chance for choice. that's what
> > I realy request from rh (and waiting for it). if there is more jurnaling fs
> > than give _me_ the chance to choice.
>
> Sure, when they'
Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but (as always) I prefer freedom and the chance for choice. that's what
> I realy request from rh (and waiting for it). if there is more jurnaling fs
> than give _me_ the chance to choice.
Sure, when they're ready.
> that's another quiestion that me
Hello...
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, redhat.angus wrote:
>
> ext3 is much better there - since it is just an extension of ext2, all the
> (very reliable by now) tools for ext2 recovery can be used.
>
> Last time I checked, reiserfs couldn't be used with software rai
On 17 Jan 2001, Thilo Mezger wrote:
> I have filed it a couple of weeks ago:
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18384
>
> Someone resolved it as NOTABUG... ;-)
You filed a different problem. ;)
While the keytables were in /usr, not running the keytable script in
runlev
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> who knows there is people east of Rhode Island in the fabled countries of
>> France, United Kingdom and Germany. :-)
> There are a number of us actually. (Most of us don't have a separate /usr
> partition though, so we don't notice. ;) )
> Wh
On 16 Jan 2001, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
> Windows was designed with crashes in mind so AFAIK it does not cache as much as
> Linux do and repairs are faster. I still have to see the Windows repair
> utilities prompt the user for what to do with inode number 152568.
I haven't seen its sour
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, K. Spoon wrote:
> > Since someone else already started the "Is it going to be in 7.1?"
> > snowball rolling, I was wondering if the LVM stuff would make it in
> > there?
>
> Who can say about 7.1 for sure, but if you look at the lat
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> Dax Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Bernhard Rosenkraenzer said once upon a time (Tue, 16 Jan 2001):
> >
> > > It isn't - it's what we're doing (at least until at least one of the
> > > journalling FSes is really ready for prime time).
> >
> > I predict
I want to burn 2 CD's with rawhide rpms. I found
ftp://rawhide.redhat.com/pub/rawhide/i386/README
but this document (because its intent is to explain CD->filesystem and
not vice versa) doesn't answer one question I have -- which RPMs must
go into disc1 and which should go into disc2?
27 matches
Mail list logo
