Hello...
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Karen Shaeffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 07:08:15AM -0800, Christopher McCrory wrote:
>>
>>>> It will be included when/if it matures
>>>
>>>> LLaP
>>>> bero
>>>>
>>>
>>> We are discussing putting reiser in the rawhide tree yes? It's a
>>> development tree, yes? Why not put in reiserfs, ext3, xfs , and jfs
>>> (IBM). Then we can all jump in the back seat and see who puts out.
>>
>
> Rawhide is a snapshot of our internal trees, which means that we need
> to be able to make working snapshots (and releases) from it...
> Besides, I think many of these have problems coexisting in the same
> kernel.
Make sense. Can you give us a ETA on a 2.4.0final srpm in the public
rawhide tree?
I opened a bugzilla on FreeS/Wan,
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23604 . One of the
things in the spec patch is a fix for this,
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8031 which came
back. With this slight tweek, patching the kernel srpm to add reiserfs,
ext3, FreeSwan, etc. is a lot easier.
Someone can supply a spec patch for reiserfs, ext3, etc. and let it live
in bugzilla for a while.
>
>
>> This would create healthy competition. Competition is good. In the long run,
>> this is really good for Red Hat--despite any short-term issues related to
>> Red Hat's connection with ext3.
>
>
> ext3 isn't ready yet - I'm pretty sure we'll have 2.4 kernels with
> ReiserFS before we have ext3 support.
--
Christopher McCrory
"The guy that keeps the servers running"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pricegrabber.com
"Linux: Because rebooting is for adding new hardware"
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
