Karen Shaeffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 07:08:15AM -0800, Christopher McCrory wrote:
> > >
> > > It will be included when/if it matures
> >
> > >
> > > LLaP
> > > bero
> > >
> >
> > We are discussing putting reiser in the rawhide tree yes? It's a
> > development tree, yes? Why not put in reiserfs, ext3, xfs , and jfs
> > (IBM). Then we can all jump in the back seat and see who puts out.
Rawhide is a snapshot of our internal trees, which means that we need
to be able to make working snapshots (and releases) from it...
Besides, I think many of these have problems coexisting in the same
kernel.
> This would create healthy competition. Competition is good. In the long run,
> this is really good for Red Hat--despite any short-term issues related to
> Red Hat's connection with ext3.
ext3 isn't ready yet - I'm pretty sure we'll have 2.4 kernels with
ReiserFS before we have ext3 support.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
