Re: 2nd try: python 2.0

Tony Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to start using the Unicode support but I can deal without it for > now. Same for list comprehensions. Install Python 2.0 in /usr/local and call it with #!/usr/bin/env python2 or something like this. I just have to agree that upgrading

Re: allowing one user to run pppd (2 solutions, some questions)

On Wed Nov 22 2000 at 22:46, Tony Nugent wrote: > Essentially, this is a question about pam. ... and I really didn't get much of a response last week to the actual questions I was asking :-( (Is there a better place to ask questions about pam?) Background: > Not long ago I posted a message

Re: Retraction: C compiled executalbe problem

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Thank you to those who helped me with this immature error, however no > more Don't put yourself down;-) That said, read the Red Hat Linux documentation, and maybe find a good beginners' book on Linux. You will learn al sorts of new tricks (I'm sure the answer to your

Re: C compiled executalbe problem

This is because the current directory(.) is not contained in the environment variable--PATH. Append it in the profile file or try to run ./program . buoyant - Original Message - From: "Del Campo, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'RedHat, DevList'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent:

Retraction: C compiled executalbe problem

Thank you to those who helped me with this immature error, however no more help is necessary now. Thanks again, Damian -- Original message > Have just started programming some C on RH6.1 > > Compiling using "gcc - o program program.c". > > Problem is that from the directory this sits in

Re: C compiled executalbe problem

* Del Campo, Damian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [001127 18:26]: > Message-ID: ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Del Campo, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'RedHat, DevList'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: C compiled executalbe problem > Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 10:17:27 +1100 > X-Mailer: Internet Mail Servi

Re: C compiled executalbe problem

"Del Campo, Damian" wrote: > > Have just started programming some C on RH6.1 > > Compiling using "gcc - o program program.c". > > Problem is that from the directory this sits in, I can't actually operate > the program > ie program doesnt' work whereas going up one directory level and > calling

C compiled executalbe problem

Have just started programming some C on RH6.1 Compiling using "gcc - o program program.c". Problem is that from the directory this sits in, I can't actually operate the program ie program doesnt' work whereas going up one directory level and calling "directory/program" does. Likewise, if I stay

Re: 2nd try: python 2.0

I'd like to start using the Unicode support but I can deal without it for now. Same for list comprehensions. I plan on wrapping a C++ library with the ExtensionClass module, so the improved suppor would be nice. Again, I can wait. The Numeric module requires distutils, so I need either Python

Re: 2nd try: python 2.0

All C python modules are binary incompatible with 2.0. It will take quite some time to work out all the problems there. What wins are in 2.0 that you really need? Matt On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:21:27AM -0700, Tony Seward wrote: > I'm reposting because I didn't get a response the first time. >

2nd try: python 2.0

I'm reposting because I didn't get a response the first time. Is there a timetable for moving to python 2.0 in rawhide? Are there any outstanding compatibility issues that need to be resolved first? Tony ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL P

(no subject)

Some here might be interested in this: http://linux.sybase.com/ase/11033downloa d.html ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list