> On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 12:48:42PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> > I presume that's the install-time "insert update disk" routine that
> > I'd rather avoid when I create my updated CDs.
>
> Right, the "insert update disk" simply takes the files on the floppy
> and loads them into /tmp/update
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 12:48:42PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> I presume that's the install-time "insert update disk" routine that
> I'd rather avoid when I create my updated CDs.
Right, the "insert update disk" simply takes the files on the floppy
and loads them into /tmp/updates on the ini
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
>Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:45:58 +0800
>From: John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: Re: 7.0 will not install
>
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 02:41:59PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
>
> True. It's fairly easy these days, though, with the magic
> /tmp/updates code override.
I presume that's the install-time "insert update disk" routine that I'd rather
avoid when I create my updated CDs.
Anyway, I've got the two ISOs; time to get the updates.
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 02:41:59PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Why was www and ftp moved to /var
> > not that this is good or bad, simply asking for peace of mind
>
> People wanted to automount /home, and with the docroots there it was
> impossible. Secondly, according to the FHS stand
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 02:41:59PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why was www and ftp moved to /var
> not that this is good or bad, simply asking for peace of mind
People wanted to automount /home, and with the docroots there it was
impossible. Secondly, according to the FHS standard
(http://
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:43:52AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> Matt
>
> If I do it, it's fixed for one person. If RHI does it, it's fixed
> for ALL RHL users.
Right, I just want people to know how I'm going to go about doing it...
> I've hacked the previous two versions of RHL to update
> Sure, I can whip some up... If you want to do it yourself:
>
> mkdir boot
> mount -o loop boot.img boot
> zcat boot/initrd.img initrd.nogz
> mkdir initrd
> mount -o loop initrd.nogz initrd
> mkdir updates
> mount updates.img updates
> mkdir initrd/tmp/updates
> cp updates/* initrd/tmp/updates
Why was www and ftp moved to /var
not that this is good or bad, simply asking for peace of mind
Kind regards
Kevin
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
Sure, I can whip some up... If you want to do it yourself:
mkdir boot
mount -o loop boot.img boot
zcat boot/initrd.img initrd.nogz
mkdir initrd
mount -o loop initrd.nogz initrd
mkdir updates
mount updates.img updates
mkdir initrd/tmp/updates
cp updates/* initrd/tmp/updates
umount initrd
gzip -9
> Chuck Byam wrote:
>
> > BTW: I like the direction of the 7.0 release, however, I share some of the
> > sentiments about the inclusion of this gcc version recently propogated
> > through the e-press.
>
> Beleive none of what you hear and only half of what you see.
> >From the outside looking in
> Anaconda Update disk:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHBA-2000-084-04.html
>
>
I haven't checked that page, but I did see the announcement.
Could we have already-updated boot disks please, for those who burn their own
CDs.
I've already seen enough updates to warrant fiddling with
Anaconda Update disk:
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHBA-2000-084-04.html
Matt
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 12:22:24PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just a little hitch
> When attempting to install 7.0 I get
> an error something like
> File /usr/lib/anaconda/isys.py, line 16, in fsSpaceAv
Just a little hitch
When attempting to install 7.0 I get
an error something like
File /usr/lib/anaconda/isys.py, line 16, in fsSpaceAvailable
return _isys.devSpaceFree(fsystem)
SystemError (2, No Such File or Dirctory')
where do we go from here?
--
Kind regards
Kevin Waterson
CEO OceaniaTLA
Chuck Byam wrote:
> BTW: I like the direction of the 7.0 release, however, I share some of the
> sentiments about the inclusion of this gcc version recently propogated
> through the e-press.
Beleive none of what you hear and only half of what you see.
>From the outside looking in it would seem R
> C compiles OK, but most of my C++ projects do not. Has anyone installed an
> older version successfully without breaking other dependencies.
redhat has promised to fix it. Give 'em a testcase or three.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL P
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Chuck Byam wrote:
>
> > Is gcc borked in this release or what? And why release a beta version of t
> he
> > compiler (2.96) in a "production" release?
>
> Here's the link that you should read:
> http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-10-09-005-21-NW-CY-RH
I got
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:12:38PM -0400, Chuck Byam wrote:
>
> C compiles OK, but most of my C++ projects do not. Has anyone installed an
> older version successfully without breaking other dependencies.
the C++ compiler from egcs 1.1.2 is still there, in the compat
packages. If you install a
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, you wrote:
.: On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 08:45:20AM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
.: > Chuck Byam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
.: >
.: > > Is gcc borked in this release or what?
.: >
.: > Works for me.
.:
.: Ditto, so far. Seems a bit faster too...
.:
C compiles OK, but most of
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 08:45:20AM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Chuck Byam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is gcc borked in this release or what?
>
> Works for me.
Ditto, so far. Seems a bit faster too...
--
Hal B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
___
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Chuck Byam wrote:
> Is gcc borked in this release or what? And why release a beta version of the
> compiler (2.96) in a "production" release?
Here's the link that you should read:
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-10-09-005-21-NW-CY-RH
--
Alexander
Homepage
Chuck Byam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is gcc borked in this release or what?
Works for me.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
32 days, 2 hours, 50 minutes, 3 seconds till we run away.
Man has never reconciled himself to the ten commandments.
___
I know of the obvious sites and have been there.. *.3dfx.com,
etc..
ANyone know where a 3dfx diagnostics program resides? I've got a
Voodoo board here that just wont work. I'd like to run some
diags on it if such utils exist. Won't work == it is detected,
but NOTHING will work with it, no 3d,
Is gcc borked in this release or what? And why release a beta version of the
compiler (2.96) in a "production" release?
C. Byam
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
Here I go talking to myself again.
> From: "Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 13:49:39 -0500
>
> Actually more to the point of what I really want to do (and didn't realize
> yet that this was my real question when I wrote the last mail), why aren't
> threads enable
Svante Signell wrote:
>
> rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so (libX11.so.6.1) results in XFree86-devel-4.0.1-0.43,
> but according to the use of kgcc (1.1.2-40) from compat-egcs-6.2-1.1.2.9, a more
> reasonable library to use would be libX11.so (libX11.so.6.1) from
> compat-libs-6.2-2!! Is this a s
26 matches
Mail list logo
