Re: Anaconda, Corel and feeling discriminated

2000-02-10 Thread Jeremy Katz
[ Friday, February 11 2000 ] had JF Martinez saying: > I have been using RedHat since the Halloween release and I have never > felt the individual user was treated adequately. When I look at > Anaconda's source code I see nothing is provided for PPP > configuration, Sound cards or instant firewal

RE: Anaconda, Corel and feeling discriminated

2000-02-10 Thread Prasanth Kumar
While not in the first reboot, Redhat does provide the control panel and linuxconf to configure PPP and soundconfig to configure sound. It doesn't come with instant firewalling but there are quite a few such packages you can download of the net as RPMS. Redhat cannot be everything to everybody.

Re: plead for documentation for changes in redhat 6.2

2000-02-10 Thread Tony Nugent
Thanks for the reply Bill, it's really nice to know that you guys/gals are quietly listening here... On Thu Feb 10 2000 at 10:44, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Tony Nugent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and > > pre-releases) of a new distribu

Anaconda, Corel and feeling discriminated

2000-02-10 Thread JF Martinez
I have been using RedHat since the Halloween release and I have never felt the individual user was treated adequately. When I look at Anaconda's source code I see nothing is provided for PPP configuration, Sound cards or instant firewalling be it during installation or at first reboot. All of t

Re: plead for documentation for changes in redhat 6.2

2000-02-10 Thread Bill Nottingham
Tony Nugent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and > pre-releases) of a new distribution. In fact, two CHANGES files... There will be something along these lines with 6.2 final. I'm not sure it will necessarily go into all the detail you need

Re: Mailman RPM?

2000-02-10 Thread José Romildo Malaquias
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 08:14:20AM -0500, Albert E. Whale wrote: > Has anyone seen GNU's Mailman program as an RPM?? I cannot seem to find > it in the usual locations. I have found a RPM for mailman 1.0 in ftp://ftp.conectiva.com.br/pub/conectiva/beta/SRPMS/ I have upgraded it to 1.1 a

Mailman RPM?

2000-02-10 Thread Albert E. Whale
Has anyone seen GNU's Mailman program as an RPM?? I cannot seem to find it in the usual locations. Albert E. Whale [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hky.com/aewhale.html -- Sr. Database, Internet and Unix Systems Consultant

Re: -- MARK --

2000-02-10 Thread Alan Cox
syslogd inserts -- MARK -- entries itself if nothing has occured for a long time so that when you read the logs you know nothing is occuring rather than something died -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

Re: plead for documentation for changes in redhat 6.2

2000-02-10 Thread Ingo Luetkebohle
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 04:54:50PM +1000, Tony Nugent wrote: > - one to describe the overall changes (eg, the installer, new > or replaced/deleted packages, new features, default desktop > changes, overall stuff like that). The "WhatsNew" section of the Install Guide has muc

Re: -- MARK --

2000-02-10 Thread Andreas Kainz
hi! > Anyone know how to track a message in /var/log/messages back to the program > that inserted it? or more immediately what program in the 5.x errata set is > inserting this annoying line? I've been trying to figure this out one man syslogd option: -m greetings andreas -- Andreas Kainz

-- MARK --

2000-02-10 Thread Chris Abbey
Anyone know how to track a message in /var/log/messages back to the program that inserted it? or more immediately what program in the 5.x errata set is inserting this annoying line? I've been trying to figure this out one process at a time for a couple months now and am really getting peeved; so f

Re: plead for documentation for changes in redhat 6.2

2000-02-10 Thread Chris Abbey
At 18:26 2/10/00 +1000, Tony Nugent wrote: >Nice to see a reply so quickly. I hope this issue gets a fair bit of >debate (as this thread died in a pathetic whimper in the lead-up to >rh61, and IIRC, rh60 before that). if memory serves the last time it was an entirely one sided plea from the user

Re: plead for documentation for changes in redhat 6.2

2000-02-10 Thread Tony Nugent
On Wed Feb 09 2000 at 23:47, George Karabin wrote: > > Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and > > pre-releases) of a new distribution. In fact, two CHANGES files... Nice to see a reply so quickly. I hope this issue gets a fair bit of debate (as this thread died in a pa

Re: plead for documentation for changes in redhat 6.2

2000-02-10 Thread George Karabin
This ought to make interpreting the output a little easier by tagging each changelog with the package name, version, and release: 'rpm -q --queryformat "\n%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}\n###