On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Russell Steffen wrote:
> Anyone else notice that RH6.1 (and apparently the official kernel sources
> too) have an old version of the tulip ethernet driver. I can tell you from
> experience that anyone who installs 6.1 on a system with a recent Linksys
> card is for a mandator
Anyone else notice that RH6.1 (and apparently the official kernel sources
too) have an old version of the tulip ethernet driver. I can tell you from
experience that anyone who installs 6.1 on a system with a recent Linksys
card is for a mandatory scavenger hunt and kernel recompile.
Russ
--
Rus
>
> JF Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > find alternate routes to introduce people to Project Independence,
> > > since I won't recommend a distribution that I can't use myself.
>
> > Can you read? Then reread my previous posts and you will see how much
> > I hate having vital sof
Does anyone know what the purpose of obtaining $BROWSER is for in
/etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc? Its always been there as long as I've used redhat
(3.0.3) and I figure that its just never been removed.
Alex
--
"Sine Linuxa sum nihil"
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/
JF Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > find alternate routes to introduce people to Project Independence,
> > since I won't recommend a distribution that I can't use myself.
> Can you read? Then reread my previous posts and you will see how much
> I hate having vital software available o
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JF
Martinez writes:
[snip]
> But I don't accept having a
> thousand defenseless beginners getting a headache after seeing three
> dozens of mail clients (bot console and X) and two hundred editors
> jsut because a couple hardcore Unixers complained loudly about t
>
> JF Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There are millions of Linux users coming from Windows who would hate
> > such software. But these people are a silent majority who don't dare
> > to tell their opinion because they lack self-confidence in front of
> > the "experts".
>
> Theref
Why is the new mysterious ppp-watch utility used in Red Hat 6.1 ? It is
called by ifup-ppp to set up and maintain dialup connection. Or, another
way, what was wrong with the old script-only scheme ? I have not found a
single mention of this program neither in Red Hat guides nor in the whole
/usr/
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I have a box with OS/2, NT and Linux 6. I don't imagine RHL 6.1 will get
> > anywhere near it; I'm sure it will stumble on OS/2 as well.
>
> It shouldnt, unless OS/2 and NT use the same partition type.
They do.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Vogelsangstras
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Andrew E. Mileski wrote:
> Look at "an" as in "-man"
I don't see any documentation for that either, just the macro file itself.
but someone else pointed me to the Bell Labs Troff Users Manual, I hope its
in there.
--
Ingo Luetkebohle / 21st Century Digital B
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Alex Kanavin wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> > Perhaps we'll all be saved by DVD. I read that Toshiba's shipping DVD and
> > not CD drives in all ots prtables RSN. presumambly by RHL 8.x a DVD distro
> > will be an option.
>
> Until then - milti
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, John Summerfield wrote:
> Perhaps we'll all be saved by DVD. I read that Toshiba's shipping DVD and
> not CD drives in all ots prtables RSN. presumambly by RHL 8.x a DVD distro
> will be an option.
Until then - milti CD is the only way. What I actually wanted was an
offici
> Where can I find a troff macro description for manpages? AFAIK, it does not
> use me, mm or one of the others but rather "mandoc".
Look at "an" as in "-man"
--
Andrew E. Mileski Software Engineer [OS Team Leader]
Rebel.com http://www.rebel.com/
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMA
Where can I find a troff macro description for manpages? AFAIK, it does not
use me, mm or one of the others but rather "mandoc".
--
Ingo Luetkebohle / 21st Century Digital Boy
dev/consulting Gesellschaft fuer Netzwerkentwicklung und -beratung mbH
url: http://www.devconsult.de/ - f
> I have a box with OS/2, NT and Linux 6. I don't imagine RHL 6.1 will get
> anywhere near it; I'm sure it will stumble on OS/2 as well.
It shouldnt, unless OS/2 and NT use the same partition type.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
> Caldera did just that: drop from the main distrib those utilities they
> thought were playing in second division. Read also that I told that
Am I mistaken, or is Calder playing in the second division?
if an utility had many users it should not be dropped. You could
> reverse my proposition
>
> On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > soon. I have yet to install RH 6.1 (BTW, on the machine
> > > with NT dual-boot :-)), but I heard several reports
> > > on local mailing lists mentioning instability
> >
> > With dual boot NT you want to pick up the errata boot floppies
> >
> >
17 matches
Mail list logo
