On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Alan Cox wrote: > > I have a box with OS/2, NT and Linux 6. I don't imagine RHL 6.1 will get > > anywhere near it; I'm sure it will stumble on OS/2 as well. > > It shouldnt, unless OS/2 and NT use the same partition type. They do. Nils -- Nils Philippsen / Vogelsangstrasse 115 / D-70197 Stuttgart / +49.711.6599405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offence. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Alan Shutko
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Riyad Kalla
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Riyad Kalla
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Tom Diehl
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Matt Nelson
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Stanislav Meduna
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Alan Cox
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Matt Nelson
- Re: updated redhat distribu... John Summerfield
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Alan Cox
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Nils Philippsen
- Re: updated redhat distribu... John Summerfield
- File this Henry J. Cobb
- Re: updated redhat distribu... John Summerfield
- Re: updated redhat distribu... JF Martinez
- Re: a workaround for upgrad... JF Martinez
- Re: More 6.1 Upgrades Woes Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: More 6.1 Upgrades Woes John Summerfield
- How to lose partitions with RH 6.1: a Mini-HOWTO Rod May