Jeff,
I'm guessing that the document your AHJ saw or is referring to is here, and
might help you prepare for the meeting with the AHJ:
http://www.ul.com/global/documents/corporate/aboutul/publications/newsletters/electricalconnections/april10.pdf
I got wind of this document from John Wiles, and
Thanks all for the good feedback. A service upgrade to this flush mount
meter/main is beyond what the owner cares to spend as it is a major project
being it is in a wall that is extremely crowded both structurally and
electrically. There is no way to get between the meter and main w/o any
modif
y, June 17, 2010 9:14 AM
To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Supply side tap not allowed
I just had my proposal for a supply side tap (between meter and main) of on a
residential system rejected by the inspector (CA) because he wants a letter
from the service panel manu
Another option is to install a gutter between the meter and the zinsco
panel. This will require pulling the meter or having the utility disconnect
the service for a short period of time..essentially the gutter is the
junction box. looks good and gives you options for adding a replacement to
Using a separate J-box is key. Even better (and cleaner) than Polaris are
NSI distribution blocks in your J-box. The inspector will appreciate the
maximum integrity. This does usually require replacing service or feeder
conductors, but it is a rock solid method for code, utility and difficult
in
n business.
Brian Teitelbaum
ASE Solar
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Oldham
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 9:14 AM
To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Supply side tap not allowed
I j
Thanks for the input Jeff. This is a basic small Meter/Main (100A) only. The
feeder leaves the main and runs about 200' to the house. Removing the short
jumper leads from the meter socket and routing them to another panel and then
back again to the Main seems like far more modification to the pa
> From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
> [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Oldham
> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 12:14 PM
> To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] Supply side tap not allowed
>
> I just had my propo
12:14 PM
> To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] Supply side tap not allowed
>
>
>
> I just had my proposal for a supply side tap (between meter and main) of
> on a residential system rejected by the inspector (CA) because he wants
> a letter from the serv
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Jeff
Oldham
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 12:14 PM
To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Supply side tap not allowed
I just had my proposal for a supply side tap (between meter and main) of
on a residential system
I just had my proposal for a supply side tap (between meter and main) of on a
residential system rejected by the inspector (CA) because he wants a letter
from the service panel manu detailing the proper method of making this tap and
that I must strictly follow it. This is a 1st for me, I've done
11 matches
Mail list logo